From the Inquirer.
Maybe this year, all the Morrisville candidates for the board of education should display their edumakashunal skillz and take the PSSA themselves before saying they they can run a school district and answer the question "Is our children learning?"?
Why the stimulus needed to keep education
By Harold Brubaker, Inquirer Staff Writer, Posted on Fri, Feb. 13, 2009
PNC typically interviews eight job candidates to find one who can pass the math test required for certain jobs at its Eastwick operations center across from the airport.
"It's costly to any corporation when you have to interview that many people to fill one job," Bill Mills, president of PNC Financial Services Group for Philadelphia and South Jersey, said yesterday.
PNC's experience is an example of why advocates say education spending belongs in the $789 billion economic-stimulus package being negotiated in Congress: Ineffective education is a drag on productivity.
C. Kent McGuire, dean of Temple University's College of Education, welcomed the money set aside for education in the compromise between House and Senate leaders - reportedly more than $90 billion - but cautioned that much more thinking needs to go into how to make the U.S. education system meet 21st-century needs.
"It's not a strategy, but it is implicit recognition that these are areas in which we have to invest," said McGuire, referring to the education spending in the bill.
McGuire and other experts said that certain kinds of education spending, such as the support to states that could prevent teachers from losing their jobs and money for school modernization and repair fit the need for short-term economic stimulus.
Spending on infrastructure is considered by many to be a legitimate part of the stimulus package because it puts people to work quickly while generating long-term productivity gains.
Likewise, spending on education is another sort of infrastructure spending because it, if done wisely, builds a productive workforce for the future that can generate faster economic growth, said Eric Thompson, an economics professor at the University of Nebraska.
Some analysts point to U.S. history to back up this argument.
They say that periods of fast U.S. economic growth, measured by increases in per capita gross domestic product, are usually preceded by substantial gains in the overall education level of the populace.
For example, within a generation of the widespread development of the public school system in the second half of the 19th century, the country had the largest literate workforce in the world, said Abby Joseph Cohen, senior U.S. investment strategist at the Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
Subsequently, between roughly 1890 and the start of World War I, the United States became the most productive nation in the world, Cohen said.
After World War II, the initial GI bill diverted nearly eight million veterans into higher education, sparing them from the dismal job market.
"It got them off the streets, so they weren't competing for the few available jobs, and it increased their skill levels," said Bob Wise, president of the Alliance for Excellent Education in Washington and former governor of West Virginia. The nation had "30 years of unprecedented economic growth afterward," Wise said.
But in the last decade or so, the percentage of 25- to 29-year-olds who completed high school has stagnated to about 86 percent, and the college completion rate has risen only modestly, according to the National Center for Education Statistics.
McGuire, of Temple, said what really matters is that the pace of educational advancement in the United States is falling behind that of other nations, particularly India and China.
It is not enough to simply make sure more students make it through college, which is the goal of the proposed $500 increase in the maximum Pell grant and the effort by Gov. Rendell to legalize video poker to raise money for tuition grants, one expert said.
"I think that there is this sort of default belief in this country that going to college means you are going to be better off no matter what you do. The reality is that colleges were not set up for a post-industrial age," said Julian Alssid, executive director of the Workforce Strategy Center, a nonprofit in New York. "We have a lot of people with college degrees who are not prepared to step into the workforce."
Some economists counter McGuire's view that modernizing schools is an important part of improving performance.
"I don't think there is much evidence that if you spruce up our buildings, our kids will learn more and be better prepared for the job market," said Gerhard Glomm, an economics professor at Indiana University in Bloomington. "You might get more bang for the buck if you hire smart teachers."
That is where PNC is putting some of its money, in teachers, funding a professorship in early-childhood education at Temple as part of a $100 million, 10-year commitment to boost education for children from birth to age 5.
"I think it's so important," Mills, of PNC, said, "but also the real challenge is that it doesn't have a pay back for a very, very long time."
Saturday, February 14, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
From today's Phila. Inquirer.
Area schools big winners in stimulus plan
By Dan Hardy and Rita Giordano
Inquirer Staff Writers
Though some details of the stimulus bill that is nearing the president's signature remain unclear, it is certain that school districts across the country and in the Philadelphia area stand to share in a big federal spending boost.
According to figures released yesterday by the House Committee on Education and Labor, the U.S. Department of Education's funding will increase by nearly $100 billion under the legislation. Related spending through other agencies for Head Start, child care, and federal school construction bonds will drive up the total for education to about $130.2 billion.
In the 2007-08 fiscal year, U.S. Department of Education's funding for all discretionary education projects was about $59.2 billion nationwide.
Pennsylvania stands to get nearly $3 billion in additional education funding during the next two years; New Jersey would get almost $2 billion.
That doesn't mean that local school districts will see a huge increase in direct federal funding. About two-thirds of the federal money the two states get will go into a "stabilization fund" to help them maintain current state levels of education spending. Exactly how that money will be parceled out among various programs remains to be determined.
One big disappointment for some school districts, especially Philadelphia's, was the decision by Congress to cut $14 billion that the House of Representatives had proposed for public school modernization. The states can still spend some of their stabilization money on school repairs, but that priority will now have to compete with many others.
Under an earlier House version of the bill, Philadelphia would have gotten about $180 million, enough to make a significant dent in about $1 billion of deferred repairs, district Chief Business Officer Michael Masch said earlier this week. The average age of school buildings in the district is 70 years, he said. "We will have to do some of this work anyway, but if we have to use our own money, we would then lack the money to invest in things like smaller class sizes, technology in the classrooms, training for our teachers, and interventions for kids who are falling behind," he said.
The bill includes $11.35 billion in new funds for special education over two years. Pennsylvania's share of the increase will be about $427 million over two years; New Jersey will get about $361 million. New Jersey got about $355 million in special education funding this school year.
"This will help everything from property taxes to providing the services the children need," said Frank Belluscio, a spokesman for the New Jersey School Boards Association. "It's a very significant adjustment."
In the Burlington City School District, the boost could translate into funds to hire behavior specialists, a resource room teacher, and a life skills teacher, said interim Superintendent Diane DeGiacomo. Funding earmarked for low-income students could pay for an intermediate school math lab, a math coach, and a teacher assistant, she said.
Title I money going to programs for low-income students will jump by $13 billion nationwide; Pennsylvania will get about $524 million of that and New Jersey $253 million. Most of that money will go to districts with large numbers of poor students.
All in all, said Thomas Gentzel, executive director of the Pennsylvania School Boards Association, "this will be extremely helpful. It will protect the state budget, and will be very helpful for districts that are struggling with declining revenues."
Gentzel said he hoped that special education money would stay close to the new levels even after the stimulus money was spent. Special education is a federal mandate that "puts a huge funding burden on local school districts," he explained. "We shouldn't be funding it the way it is now. The feds have to ultimately step up to the plate."
Because the funding in the stimulus plan is weighted to give more to poorer districts, many suburban schools will not get much.
In South Jersey, the affluent Haddonfield School District will get no Title I funds and $487,000 in special education money over two years, about 1.6 percent of its budget.
The prosperous, high-achieving Wallingford-Swarthmore district in Delaware County will get no Title I funds and $725,000 in special education money over two years, just over 1 percent of its budget.
"It's disappointing," said Superintendent Rudolph Rubeis.
Post a Comment