Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.

Monday, March 23, 2009

Caution: School Merging Ahead

From the Inquirer.

CAUTION: SCHOOLS MERGING AHEAD
Rendell says Pa. has too many school districts, but his cure may be worse than the problem.

Bob Martin is a former Inquirer writer and editor Posted on Sun, Mar. 22, 2009

School districts are like errant siblings. You beat them up, bawl them out, and shame them into good behavior - until an outsider comes along and starts coercing them. Then you put up your fists and say you'll defend them to the death.

These days, the outsider is Gov. Rendell, who wants to force consolidation of hundreds of school districts statewide. He believes that Pennsylvania's 501 school districts are too many, that consolidation would reduce administrative costs and taxes while enhancing academics through greater course offerings and extracurricular programs. His education press secretary, Michael Race, says that arguments against the plan are "excuses for inaction" and constitute an "us- against-them parochialism that doesn't serve anyone in Pennsylvania."

But isn't parochialism just a pejorative way of defining local control - and might not inaction be the wiser course when the cure is worse than the problem?

In 2006, the state's Legislative Budget and Finance Commission paid Standard & Poor's $236,573 to study the cost-effectiveness of consolidating Pennsylvania's school districts. Among its findings:

The optimum school district size for cost-effectiveness is 2,500-2,999 students.

There is "virtually no correlation" between size of enrollment and standardized test scores.

Consolidation would face "considerable opposition," involving such factors as socioeconomic and demographic differences between school districts, the potential for longer bus routes for schoolchildren, less local control, and "a loss of local identity due to different community cultures and traditions."

Despite these conclusions, the Rendell administration feels that consolidations "have to be done on a much broader scale," Race said. So its draft legislation (yet to be introduced) would mandate that every school district in Pennsylvania have at least 5,000 students. Of the 62 districts in Southeastern Pennsylvania, 34 have projected enrollments of fewer than 5,000 students in the 2011-12 school year. Under the proposal, they would be forced into shotgun marriages with other districts and require all-new school boards.

In these districts, where a two-block change in the bus route can pack a meeting room with angry parents, consolidation is sure to stir gale-force winds of protest from a coalition of school staff, school board members, parents, students, and yes, even taxpayers. If politics makes strange bedfellows, they're going to need an extra-large mattress for this horde.

Let's assume a merger model of two districts with different demographics.

New contracts would have to be negotiated with every union, whether it be for teachers, custodians, clerical staff, or bus drivers. Any union worth its dues will fight to bring every category of employee up to the pay and benefit level of the best existing contract - and that means more taxes.

One superintendent would lose his or her job, but both would have existing multiyear contracts still in force from their prior districts. So the "losing" superintendent would keep getting paid for the duration of his contract, even if he or she wasn't working.

Assuming that the No Child Left Behind Act is reauthorized by Congress, an academically proficient district being merged with another that had failed to make adequate yearly progress under the law could face intervention and eventual sanctions for its inherited, underperforming schools.

Merging districts would assume one another's debt and pension obligations, which could affect bond ratings and also spell higher taxes.

If the consequences of consolidations raise hackles, then Rendell's method for achieving the new school district alignment is sure to trigger outrage.

Whereas the prior school consolidation in Pennsylvania (from 2,700 to 501 districts) stretched over about 25 years last century, the governor is seeking to put this one in place in about 30 months.

The task seems mind-boggling: Under the proposed enabling legislation, leaders from both parties and branches of the General Assembly would appoint a 12-member study commission. It would have one year to hold 10 public hearings statewide and then approve up to two consolidation plans for General Assembly consideration. If no plan were endorsed by the commission, it would be sent back out to the hustings for 10 more public hearings and then directed to approve a proposal within six months.

Once the plan or plans got to the General Assembly, legislators would vote them up or down without amendment. That's right. Your elected representative could not modify the new districts' boundaries. Otherwise, Race said, consolidation could be "subject to death by a thousand cuts."

And if the General Assembly voted the plan down, then the State Board of Education could draw up the new districts itself.

So, first an appointed commission proposes - and then possibly an appointed board imposes - a measure that could affect 1.8 million schoolchildren and legions of parents, taxpayers, and interest groups across Pennsylvania. Meanwhile, our state legislators (with the exception of the 12 on the panel) would be reduced to political eunuchs. It's not my idea of democracy.

Napoleon Bonaparte said that a revolution is an idea that has found its bayonets. Ed Rendell has an idea, but let's hope he's several bayonets short of a revolution.

E-mail Bob Martin at inkwire86@verizon.net.

FORCED TO COMBINE?

Rendell's draft plan would require school districts with fewer than 5,000 students to consolidate. Area districts at risk and their projected 2011-12 enrollment:

Bucks County
Bristol Borough 1,271
Morrisville 728
New Hope-Solebury 1,671
Palisades 1,809

Chester County
Great Valley 4,255
Kennett Consolid. 4,398
Octorara Area 2,782
Oxford Area 4,164
Phoenixville Area 3,200
Twin Valley 3,782
Unionville-Chadds Ford 4,219

Delaware County
Chester Upland 2,765
Chichester 3,359
Interboro 3,561
Marple Newtown 3,434
Penn-Delco 3,497
Radnor Township 3,628
Rose Tree-Media 3,631
Southeast Delco 4,100
Springfield 3,505
Wallingford-
Swarthmore 3,437

Montgomery County
Colonial 4,991
Upper Dublin 4,150
Upper Merion 3,907
Upper Moreland 2,936
Upper Perkiomen 3,344
Wissahickon 4,364
Cheltenham 4,105
Hatboro-Horsham 4,893
Jenkintown 538
Lower Moreland 2,476
Pottsgrove 3,259
Pottstown 3,102
Springfield 2,116

SOURCE: Enrollment Projections, Pa. Dept of Education, 2009

2 comments:

Jon said...

Shotgun marriages, all new school boards, gale-force winds of protest from a coalition of school staff, school board members, parents, students, and taxpayers, contract and union issues, paying contractual obligations to forced-out-of-work Administrators, legal, debt, pension, and credit rating issues, etc.

Sounds like this thing will breeze right through. Good thing Gov. Rendell is just starting his 1st term, and he can serve as many terms in a row as he wants.

Ooops! I checked it out. Gov. Rendell is in his 2nd term. He has been in office since Jan. 2003. His 2nd term ends in Jan. 2011. Oh, and he can't serve a 3rd consecutive term. My bad. Well, if he can't bring it home well before the Nov. 2010 election because he's rapidly approaching lame duck status, I'm sure his successor will carry on with it, and if they can't pull it off, Rendell will run again in 2014, and .......

My point is - if you think you want this, fight for it, but don't hang your hat on it.

Jon said...

From today's BCCT.

Hello, frying pan?

Yes, fire?



Critic misleads readers

On Feb. 27 guest opinion blasted the Pennsbury school board, teachers and their union. The writer misled readers by stating the highest possible salary obtainable in the entire district, and lets you believe that the teachers as a whole earn that amount. Wrong!

He also wants you to believe that residents are "paying higher property taxes to give away freebies" to teachers. In my opinion, this also is wrong!

The author cleverly leads readers to believe that the teachers are putting demands on the school board through their union to acquire more, when the truth is they are only asking to maintain what they have. He also neglected to tell you that the teachers have made concessions in past contracts.

The critic then went on to raise the plight of the jobless and elderly. Again, misdirecting your anger. No one wants to lose what they have always had, not Raffle, not you, and not the teachers! And the teachers and school board are not responsible for people losing their jobs or their homes.

Advertisement Fact is, people enjoy living in an area with an excellent school district. I have heard many people say that they moved to Falls because of Pennsbury. I was a student in the district, and my children are students now. I will gladly support the district and the teachers no matter how hard it gets. Why? Because it is the best chance for my children to get ahead in a world full of self-centered, greed-driven, manipulating people. If you do not want to support the Pennsbury School District that is fine. You can always move. But don't put down my school district, and don't dare blame my teachers!

Gerald Armstrong

Falls

March 23, 2009 01:10 AM

Submitting your vote... RATING: Not rated yet. Be the first who rates this item!
Click the rating bar to rate this item.
Print E-mail this Buzz up!ShareThis
E-mail This Story
E-mail: *
Your Name: *




Viewing threshold: Show all Rating higher than 0 Rating higher than -2 Rating higher than -5 Rating higher than -10 Comments
Rebecca , 03-23-09, 4:02 am | Rate: 1 | Report

If the author of this piece had searched the name of the author of the piece he blasted, he would find that this person is a realtor, so it would not be in his best interest financially to put down the school district. There are real problems in these schools. The reality is that salaries and benefits make up over 70% of the budget.

When the principal requests parent donations of baby wipes because "the bathrooms by the cafeteria are too small to accommodate an entire grade level coming from recess" to lunch to eat their finger foods something is wrong.
I am still waiting for those "better schools" we were promised.
People cannot just pick up and move their families when their jobs are here and particularly not in a stagnant real estate market which could get worse if we don't face the problems first and work together to solve them.


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 4:03 am | Rate: 1 | Report

http://timeforchangepennsbury.blogspo...


march, 03-23-09, 7:04 am | Rate: -1 | Report

Rebecca your bashing of Pennsbury schools and the teachers is getting old.


pajmf, 03-23-09, 9:10 am | Rate: 1 | Report

If you wanted the "best chance for [your] children to get ahead..." you would not send them to the Pennsbury schools.


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 9:21 am | Rate: 1 | Report

march, I am not bashing teachers. I have the utmost respect for teachers and the teaching profession. If you read my blogs you would know that. actually, my daughter starts student teaching in the fall.
It is difficult to solve problems until you acknowledge that there is one.


raplk, 03-23-09, 11:21 am | Rate: 0 | Report

"No one acknowledges give backs". Teachers write that on the board 100 times until you learn it by heart.

Then do what you've always done...help the community.

PHS is the best!


stop it now, 03-23-09, 12:46 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

I believe the teachers should get combat pay in Pennsbury Schools after one of the educated darings caused a bomb scare---give it a break folks its not the cost of teachers its 74 percent of the families paying for the 26 percent with kids in school!!!!!


DownTheMiddle, 03-23-09, 3:02 pm | Rate: -1 | Report

You are an utter and complete clown. Council Rock has had several bomb threats, a kid brought a gun to CB East and so on and so on.

People just be aware that if Rebecca has her way all of our kids will have to pray to her God 4 times daily and wear uniforms that cover your kids from ankle to wrist to neck. Maybe they will be able to reach the water fountain and won't have to step in goose poop though.


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 3:19 pm | Rate: 1 | Report

...clowns to the left of me, clowns to the right, clown down the middle is ...you....


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 3:23 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

They are still kids even in high school. If the schools are not teaching them responsibility and how to follow the rules with the basic simple things like wash your hands before you eat starting in kindergarten, and are teaching only for the test but not for real life, what do you think is going to happen to the?. Parents can only do so much. They learn from their peers and their teachers and Principal.


Falls Resident, 03-23-09, 3:53 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

Here is an idea, let the state take the children away from the parents at the age of 2, let the state raise them, educate them, then give them back when they are 18...

Parents can only do so much? Are you kidding? PARENTS need to take responsibility for their OWN children. Society has become too dependent upon the government raising and taking responsibility for their kids...


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 3:56 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

response to "STop it now"
If more families had kids in school your taxes would be even higher!
But I can see how the 74 percent with children have have pressured against those 26% with children and has driven this situation to the brink.
Property tax reform is overdue. Newtown township has a 1% income tax for schools but there are other options.
but just getting costs in line with reality is the first step.
Nonetheless, it is the responsibility of communities to support their schools. Property values and quality of your neighborhoods are driven by the quality and reputation of the schools whether you have children in them or not.


buckspa, 03-23-09, 5:31 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

Speaking directly to the "they just want to maintain what they have". Why are teachers the only ones who are allowed to maintain what they have? Thousands are taking pay cuts, thousands more laid off, still thousands more fired out right. They would all love to "maintain", but that is not the state of reality.

Teachers still get a free pension, job security (tenure, doesn't everyone get that?) and fairly low out of pocket expense for health benefits.

Again why should everyone else have to take less (i.e. pay more in taxes) just so the teachers can "maintain"?


Rebecca , 03-23-09, 6:07 pm | Rate: 0 | Report

Falls resident of course we parents need to take responsibility for our own children and some parents are not. But those of us that do, send them to school and it is all unlearned as the school teaches them that it is all just for the test not for real life and you don't have to do it here at school and what your parents taught you does not matter here.
They don't believe us until they are like 25. Then most only learn the hard way.