Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.

Sunday, January 11, 2009

Quakertown: $4.8 Million Shortfall

From the BCCT.

Has anyuone asked the Emperor yet what the 2009-10 budget looks like here at home?

How about the 2008-09 budget?


District budget facing $4.8 million shortfall
By: HILARY BENTMAN

Quakertown school board members got their first look at the 2009-10 budget and it's probably one they'd like to forget.

That's because the dismal economy and declining revenues have left the district $4.8 million in the hole.

The administration is recommending drawing $4.1 million in reserves down to zero to give officials time to make further cuts to not only balance the budget but build up the fund balance again.

"We can't have a budget with negative numbers," said Superintendent Lisa Andrejko.

Officials acknowledge starting with a zero fund balance is a scary proposition, particularly if the money can't be found to replenish the account.

After an early round of cuts, the district is looking at an $87.9 million preliminary budget, which is $3.4 million, or 4 percent, higher than the current $84.5 million budget.

Taxes will certainly increase next year; the question remains by how much.

Under a state-set cap, the district is allowed to increase taxes by 4.1 percent, or 5.14 mills, before seeking voter approval. For a home assessed at the district average of $28,800, that translates to a $148 tax increase, for a total bill of $3,762.

However, Quakertown can exceed this cap without voter permission through exceptions -ways for schools to disregard certain expenses in their budgets, such as construction, retirement and health care costs that contribute to the need for higher taxes.

With its allowable exceptions, Quakertown could raise taxes by about 4.59 percent, or 5.755 mills, which translates to a tax increase of $166, for a total bill of $3,780.

The district has fallen victim to the foundering economy.

Several major businesses within the district, including Lowes and Target, have succeeded in getting Bucks County to reassess their property values because of a decline in their worth. When a property's assessment value drops so does the amount of taxes the district generates.

The district has lost about $125,000 in revenue because of reassessments, said business manager Sylvia Lenz.

New construction in the district has also dropped off, along with home sales, hurting the amount collected in real estate transfer taxes. The district has also seen revenue from earned income tax increase by less than 1 percent, compared with the 3 percent to 5 percent increases seen in previous years, said Lenz.

As for the cuts the district will consider, no area is off the table. Everything from new and vacant staff positions, to technology, facility improvements, class electives and sports will be examined.

"Throughout every level we're going to see reductions," said Andrejko. "Every level is going to have some impact."

Officials will continue to work on the plan with a preliminary budget up for adoption on Feb. 12.

2 comments:

Jon said...

More from today's BCCT. Lawyers? Fight? A? Fireworks? Store? I didn't realize that these words could be put together in this order. I knew they could be summoned to fight a school, but a fireworks store?


Hearing on fireworks store

Bucks County Courier Times

The Bristol Township Council has instructed its lawyers to fight the project.

The Bristol Township Zoning Board could vote Monday night on plans for a fireworks store and warehouse near a chemical manufacturer and I-95.

A hearing on the project is scheduled for 7 p.m. in the municipal building, 2501 Bath Road.

Based in Ohio, Phantom Fireworks said its proposed location in the Keystone Industrial Park is in compliance with all local laws, which forbid fireworks in any other area of town.

Still, the plans have drawn criticism from members of the township council as well as a local fire chief. At a council meeting last summer, the board voted unanimously to have its lawyers fight the application.

It was only two years ago that the council enacted a zoning law limiting fireworks stores to such planned industrial districts. That came after the state Legislature voted to allow fireworks sales in Pennsylvania.

While fireworks retailers can operate here, no resident of this state can purchase or operate fireworks without a special permit. Phantom Vice President William Weimer said the majority of his customers will be residents of New Jersey and Delaware with special permission or permits to use fireworks in those states.

Company officials also were adamant that the store would be "no more dangerous than any other business" in Bristol Township. "These fireworks will make pops. They might make some bangs. But it's not going to explode [if there is a fire]," Weimer said.

Newportville Fire Co. President Herb Schoell isn't buying it. Schoell pointed to a series of fires that forced the evacuation of Keystone. One of those fires occurred at United Chemical Technologies, a business that would sit next door to Phantom.

UCT manufactures silicon polymers and other chemical compounds.

used in testing devices for steroid use and pesticides. UCT owner Mike Telepchak said a fireworks store would be too close for comfort.

January 10, 2009 03:30 AM

Comments
milton, 01-10-09, 7:46 am | Rate: 0 | Report

Here we go big brother picking on a little store owner who would bring JOBS to our township.
Morrisville has a store that dose a fine job. Why do we have to fight a legal store with the right to be there???

Jon said...

Last but not least, STS, I don't see it on-line, but today's hard copy BCCT has a very interesting graphic listing the average property taxes for the municipalities in Lower Bucks County.

Guess what, Morrisville's property taxes for non-school services are among the highest at $788/yr. Only Bristol's $792 and Upper Makefield's $880 are higher, with most much lower (in the <$200-$500 range). And Morrisville's $70 tax increase this year is the highest of the 20 municipalities. Most of the others (15/19) had no increase.

At $3,371/yr, Morrisville's massively-maligned school taxes are mid-pack (4th highest out of 8). Ironically, Pennsbury is the highest ($4,518).

What I find amazing is that Morrisville's non-school taxes are almost one-quarter (23.4%) of its school taxes. For what? I know the school district educates on the order of 1,000 students, but what do we get for our $788?

I know I pay separately (several hundred dollars/yr) for water, sewer, and trash pick-up. I know that street paving is way down from a few years ago. I know that the Bridge St. and Penna. Ave. sidewalks and street lights came from grant monies, not property taxes. We don't get that much snow that needs plowing. Street sweeping is a rarity. There's only 1 Code Enfocement Officer that I know of. It takes several years of inquiry to get a tree cut down. Police presence is not exactly overwhelming.

I'm sure there are many dedicated and hard-working borough employees, just like there are dedicated hard-working teachers. But where is the outrage? Heck, where is the questioning AT ALL? Where is the benchmarking? Why is there so much resistance to business development that could reduce residential property taxes?

I know people read this blog. Lay it on us, please!