From the BCCT.
"Make the time for your kid. Get out there and find out what's going on," I've been asking that for a very long time. These yahoos with their back room deals wouldn't be able to remain if more parents came out to see who is running the education of their children.
"During the summer, the administration will spend some time to determine a longer-range plan..." This is a long haul, folks. We have been waiting over a year now for the stop the school people to tell us what's next. When we fold this little emergency into the mix, not only is it the Emperor's Christmas present (antiChrist-mas present perhaps?), but the temporary work around solutions become more and more the daily reality: One K-12 school.
Did you ever notice that EVERYTHING the stop the school people campaigned against is exactly what they have done? Yet there's so sense of embarrassment from any one of them.
Modular classrooms should be ready next month
By: MANASEE WAGH
A public hearing will take place Jan. 29 to discuss closing M.R. Reiter Elementary School permanently.
Displaced Morrisville students should be attending school in modular classrooms and other district locations by Feb. 2. A school furnace explosion forced them out of their classrooms.
Since Dec. 17, the M.R. Reiter Elementary School emergency compelled the district to place more than 250 students in the middle/high school, the Morrisville YMCA and Grandview Elementary School. They have been there since Dec. 17, but those locations were meant for very short-term use.
Nobody was hurt in the late night explosion.
Paul d'Angelo, the district's business administrator, said the eight modular classrooms should be in place outside Grandview Elementary School by Jan. 23. Part of the delay between getting the classrooms and using them is due to two teacher in-service days at the end of this month, he said.
As of Feb. 2, the district plans to place the first and second grades in the modular classrooms. Kindergarten, third and fourth grades will attend classes in Grandview. Pre-K students are still in the nearby YMCA and may remain there, said d'Angelo. Fifth-grade students will go to the high school. Young children in the high school are kept separate from the older kids, Superintendent Elizabeth Yonson said when Reiter students initially were placed at the high school.
Insurance on Reiter is paying for the $433,472 cost to deliver, rent and operate the classrooms. Each will include its own restroom and be surrounded by a fence for added safety, Yonson said at a Monday meeting to approve them.
"It's a plan for the rest of the school year," d'Angelo said. "During the summer, the administration will spend some time to determine a longer-range plan. We're not looking for the kids to be in the modulars long-term."
But Greta O'Keefe, the parent of a Reiter second-grader, believes the students may be stuck with their temporary placements much longer. "I see it as them leaving this as a permanent situation. I don't see this board majority as fixing anything," she said.
O'Keefe said that her son's education has been stripped down to math worksheets and spelling. Other parents also said their children's regular lessons have been suffering since their displacement.
The problem is that teachers aren't allowed to enter Reiter to retrieve lesson materials while the school is being cleaned of carbon dust left behind by the explosion.
Tim Lastichen, director of facilities, said the district started getting teaching materials to Reiter instructors Wednesday. The pre-K teachers should get their materials today, he said.
Once a thorough cleaning is done, the school will undergo tests to detect toxic substances, Lastichen said. Reiter's insurance company is paying for the cleaning and tests.
Insurance will also cover an engineer's evaluation of the heating system. Until then, the district won't know if the system is salvageable, Lastichen said.
Both O'Keefe and board member Joseph Kemp would like to see the board plan renovations of the high school so it can house all grades.
That plan would have to start with a public referendum and would likely involve substantial renovations to keep elementary, middle and high school students separate, said Kemp, the parent of a Reiter second-grader.
"What I hope for in at least the next couple of years is that the board will decide to keep Grandview open, and we can update some systems there," he said. "I could certainly live with modulars there for a couple years. If it's feasible and we do move everyone into the high school, we'll have time to do it right."
In the meantime, the district may sell Reiter.
It's in worse shape than the district's other elementary school and its middle/senior high school. The board has scheduled a public hearing on Jan. 29 for community input about possibly closing Reiter permanently.
"I hope they shut Reiter down," said O'Keefe. "I think it's a piece of crap. They should be renovating the high school."
A former school board member, O'Keefe said she is shocked at how few parents attend school board meetings.
"Make the time for your kid. Get out there and find out what's going on," she advised.
The board has to wait 90 days after the hearing before it can make a decision about closing down the school, according to school code.
Kemp hopes the Reiter property in the residential district of Grandview Avenue near Palmer Street is sold to a housing developer.
Penn-Jersey Real Properties, a local real estate developer, approached the district about building 20 town homes on the Reiter property after the previous board decided to build a brand new school housing all grades, said Kemp. The new board majority canceled that plan to stop rising taxes.
Kemp thinks the board should approach the developer again and entertain "any and all" offers.
"That would help not only the district but the town," he said. "We just don't have enough taxpayers."
Thursday, January 8, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
They don't seem to be wired for shame or embarrassment. Or they're extremely good at covering - even to themselves. Wow, that's deep.
If today was not an endless highway,
If tonight was not a crooked trail,
If tomorrow wasn't such a long time,
Then lonesome would mean nothing to you at all.
Yes, and only if my own true love was waitin',
Yes, and if I could hear her heart a-softly poundin',
Only if she was lyin' by me,
Then I'd lie in my bed once again.
I can't see my reflection in the waters,
I can't speak the sounds that show no pain,
I can't hear the echo of my footsteps,
Or can't remember the sound of my own name.
Yes, and only if my own true love was waitin',
Yes, and if I could hear her heart a-softly poundin',
Only if she was lyin' by me,
Then I'd lie in my bed once again.
There's beauty in the silver, singin' river,
There's beauty in the sunrise in the sky,
But none of these and nothing else can touch the beauty
That I remember in my true love's eyes.
Yes, and only if my own true love was waitin',
Yes, and if I could hear her heart a-softly poundin',
Only if she was lyin' by me,
Then I'd lie in my bed once again.
Paul d'Angelo, the district's business administrator, said the eight modular classrooms should be in place outside Grandview Elementary School by Jan. 23. Part of the delay between getting the classrooms and using them is due to two teacher in-service days at the end of this month, he said.
Let's see - there are 10 days between Jan. 23 and Feb. 2 (fittingly, Ground Hog Day). 2 of these 10 days are teacher in-service days. Yeah, I'd say that's "part" of the delay. If my elementary school-taught math skills are correct, that's 20%. What's the other 80%?
The wheels on the bus go round and round, .....
15+ days should be enough time to simply truck them in and plop them on the land, but what about connecting water, sewer, electricity? Gas? (I am guessing heat is electric). Data/phone? Then there's license and inspection, etc.
It seems like it would take considerably longer than 2+ weeks to accomplish all this. I think Jan 23 is a very aggressive/unrealistic date. I'm betting on mid Feb.
Or perhaps I'm just a pessimist. You decide.
As we wait for the modulars to arrive..... I was trawling some older posts when I saw this one from October 30, 2007, about 1 week before the election that swept in Hellmann-Mihok-Radosti-Farrell (& Heater & Reithmeyer, who have broken or are breaking from this pack). It contains an email string from a couple parents asking a Stop the School "candidate" some questions about their "plans" & other topics. I believe it was later revealed that the "candidate" was none other than Marlys Mihok.
Sorry it's so long, but check out candidate Mihok's responses, especially this one: "You may hear about our dangerous buildings but if that were true students would not be occupying classrooms now. The current school board can point out no dangerous conditions because none exist." Yep, but you must have changed your mind 4 months later (2/27/08, to be exact) when it was time for you to vote on the imperative "safety-related" cursory studies/repairs, when you, you, you, ......WERE ABSENT!
Also check out her statement: "Teachers and administration all have contracts and can not be fired by the Stop The School candidates". True, maybe they can't be fired, but you can sure rip up a high-performing administrator's 5-year contract and hand them a 3-year one, take it or leave it.
REMEMBER - 4 BOARD SEATS ARE UP FOR GRABS IN THE MAY 19 PRIMARY ELECTION. IF YOU DON'T LIKE THE WAY THINGS ARE GOING, PLEASE GET INVOLVED AND HELP GET 4 BRIGHT, FREE-THINKING, PROGRESSIVE PEOPLE ONTO THE BOARD.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Are the NSNs Losing It?????
I was forwarded this email thread and I think it's fascinating to see what is going on in Morrisville. The NSNs are imploding bit by bit as people see them for what they really are.
Warning--Here's the evidence. The
NSNs are ready to contract out your child's education to a neighboring school district. If you thought being from Morrisville made you a paraiah before, imagine your Morrisville kid trying out for an activity or team as a contract outsider in Pennsbury, Bristol, or another school system. Trenton maybe?
The NSNs do not care about, and even ignore, the school safety issue. And I have it directly from one of the NSN candidates.
Here's the email chain. Other than removing the email addresses and specific identifying names, this is the actual chain. Thankfully, there's two dads out there who took on this candidate who is apparently too scared to reply. The truth hurts I guess...
----- Original Message ----
From: Candidate
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 6:02:26 PM
Subject: Lies
Dear XXXX,
It is not true that we will send students to Bristol Township Schools or cancel art, music or sports. Teachers and administration all have contracts and can not be fired by the Stop The School candidates. These are all lies made up by desperate people who are willingly to say anything to win your vote for the Community candidates.
We intend to give our children the best education that the 24,000 dollars we spend on each student will allow. And that is much more than they are getting now. Please do not believe these lies spread by people who lost in the primary election and dredged up three people to continue their agenda to build this poorly planned, inferior constucted school. They sold bonds for this project at 8 dollars a thousand when the going rate is 3.75. Why? For who's benefit? And this is just the tip of the iceberg. We have information on the architect, engineering firm and the obnoxious attorney Kaplin that we can't come out with untill after the election.
Just think about it. Bristol !? Really !? Why send our kids to the only district with test score lower than ours? Lies, lies and more lies.
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message -----
From: Mom
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 9:16 PM
Subject: Re: Lies
Okay Moms Read Below
Thank you XXXXX : )
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message ----
From: Dad 1
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 12:02:18 PM
Subject: Lies
THIS IS A DAD,
WHAT YOU SAY SOUNDS GOOD BUT IF ITS A LIE THEN WHY IS THERE A WITNESS TO MR XXXXX TALKING ABOUT SENDING OUR KIDS TO BRISTOL. IF THIS IS SUCH A LIE THEN WHY DID MR XXXXX SAY IT.
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message ----
From: Dad 2
Sent: Saturday, October 27, 2007 1:46 AM
Subject: Re: Lies
Hi XXXXX
Thanks for this email. However I question anything said in here. I see conspiracy ramblings about people getting rich and alleged information that canot be revealed until after the election. If it is all so important, why isn't it released now to ensure a victory on election day? We are to support these people yet they still have yet to reveal what they are going to do. Even with seven months since the May primary they have to refute stories rather than defending their plan. Doesn't that make you wonder?
----- Original Message ----
From: Candidate
Subject: Re: Lies
Date: Saturday, October 27, 2007 4:03:56 PM
Dear XXXXX XXXXX,
I am not aware of the alledged statement that XXXXX XXXXX made to your undisclosed person.XXXXX XXXXX wouldn't say such a thing and I am certain your information must be incorrect. If you wish to speak to XXXXX XXXXX personally I would be happy to pass along his phone number to you so you may speak to the source.
I appreciate your concerns as a Dad in our district and I can assure you we have your childs education as our highest priority. We need to hold our teachers accountable for every childs progress in the district and direct more of your tax dollars toward that goal and not a new building. You may hear about our dangerous buildings but if that were true students would not be occupying classrooms now. The current school board can point out no dangerous conditions because none exist.
If I can answer any more of your questions please feel free to e-mail me again.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message ----
From: Dad 2
Subject:Re: FW: Re: Lies
Date:Monday, October 29, 2007 5:11:29 PM
Dear Group--
I received this reply from XXXXX, regarding the issue that was brought up concerning the rates in bonds between 3.75 and 8 per thousand.
It would seem that this would clear up any mischaracterizations on this subject to the satisfaction of all concerned and the tip of this "iceberg" is quickly melting.
Thanks,
XXXXX
-----Original Message-----
From: XXXXX XXXXX
Subject: ANswer to your question
Hi XXXXX,
Below is the answer to your question. The reason we were charged 8% instead of 3.5% is because of the small amount of money we borrowed. It's like anything else - the more of something we purchase the less we have to pay it. The people that did our bonding have to do the same work whether they do it for $28.5 million or $200 million. They are therefore going to charge less (percentage wise) on the $200 million bond because the cost will be spread out over more dollars than the small issuance. Also the districts that issue the larger $ bonds are usually the bigger districts that have better purchasing power.
I hope this answers your question. Please feel free to contact me if you have any additional questions. Also, please feel free to forward this response to others who share your concern.
Regards,
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message ----
From: Dad 1
Subject:Re: Lies
Date:Monday, October 29, 2007 10:15:25 PM
XXXXX,
thank you for replying to me. i would like to know what is the plan for the schools and the kids if you and those running with you are elected. it would be nice to get an email from each candidate about this issue and this issue alone. is shipping the children to another school an option or is that something that you would never consider. i am more than satisfied with the morrisville schools and i have had two girls in school here for 3 years now. i do not want them to go anywhere else. not bristol and not pennsbury. and if that means that we need to build a new school then i am fine with that but the one thing i do not want to see happen is children having to go anywhere else to school. if you send them to a worse school district then they suffer and if you send them to a better and "bigger" district then they lose out in sports and activities because most would be cut from the teams. as for my source the first was a high school student and did not mention XXXXX XXXXX just that the "new school board" was planning to ship the 9-12 grades to bristol. then when i did some checking with people that should know whether this was true one of those people named XXXXX XXXXX as having stated that the plan was to ship out the 9-12 grades to bristol. i will contact my source and ask them to come forward.
what scares me the most is who can i really believe? as candidates you can tell us whatever we want to hear to get our vote and then
once elected for the next four years you have the majority and can do whatever you like because, if i understand correctly, the school board does not need the public's permission on the decisions that they make. so the only time i have any say in what the school board does is on election day and that is once every four years. there are two questions that each candidate needs to answer for me before i can give them my vote and that is
1. what is the plan for the schools. shipping out or staying here.
2. will you agree to resign if you change your position after the election.
no political dancing around the issue answers direct and specific please. i am not interested in other issues just those two.
i know i am being a pain about all this but i have a heart for the young people of morrisville and so it is not just about my kids but all the kids in the morrisville area.
thanks,
XXXXX XXXXX
----- Original Message ----
From: Dad 2
Subject: Re: Lies
Date: Tuesday, October 30, 2007 9:41:14 AM
Dear Group--
Thank you XXXXX! I second this request. For far too long all we hear is "Stop the School". The next question is the one that is always ignored -- "What's Next?" I have been waiting since before the primaries to hear what their plan is. It's easy to say no new taxes (and support no new taxes) without needing to face the realities of life.
My kids want the Morrisville schools. That's why we bought our home here. But I'm not going to buy a secret plan either.
At the risk of starting more unwanted conversation, I ferverently disagree with the statement
"You may hear about our dangerous buildings but if that were true students would not be occupying classrooms now. The current school board can point out no dangerous conditions because none exist."
Has anyone read the buildings report, freely available from the mv.org website?
http://mv.org/files/news/School%20District%20Building%20Reports%20%2Epdf !--[if !vml]--!--[endif]-
I see quite a bit that is potentially dangerous just by using the search feature on the word "unsafe"
The air handling units and ductwork are over forty years old, are unreliable, have far exceeded their useful service lives, and are, in part, unsafe for continued use.
Branch circuit panelboards are approximately forty years old and are in poor condition. The ability to safely interrupt fault current upon short circuit, or overload is highly suspect. Replacement circuit breakers are not available for these panels. The overall condition is unsafe for future use.
The propane-fired water heater appears to be over twenty years old and beyond its useful service life. The system may be unsafe in view of the age of the existing system, and original safety devices now required of equipment manufacturers.
The Electric service equipment (Federal Pacific) lost UL Certification in 1981, the existing equipment is unsafe for continued use, much less future use.
If people sue because McDonald's coffee is too hot, what will the lawsuit responsibility be for the Stop the School people if someone gets hurt because of a defective school electrical system or unsafe ductwork?
Frankly, if XXXXX's request and my seconding for a fuller explanation goes unanswered, why should anyone support the Stop the School people?
Thanks,
XXXXX
Wow! So let's put this into context. Here's the NSN agenda:
Stop the School! But don't ask us any more questions. Vote for us! And then we can ignore you.
We're not sending the kids to Bristol. But don't ask us about other school districts we might send the kids to.
LIES! LIES! LIES! Our opponents spread LIES! But don't look too closely into our wildly inaccurate statements. We want to Stop the School!
If you're not with us, you're against us. Stop asking for our plan. That just proves you're against us.
There's nothing physically unsafe about the schools. The buildings report is a LIE. And you know we would never LIE!
The attorney is obnoxious, the current school board is obnoxious, the architect is obnoxious, and they all LIE! We know the best course. And, by the way, questioning us is obnoxious and only obnoxious people lie, so you are all LIARS!
There you are ladies and gentlemen: The American political system in action, the model for democracy around the world.
Thanks for the refresher, Jon. It was an interesting read a year+ later and really puts in perspective where we were then and where we are now.
For cross reference sake, here is a link to that posting:
http://savethemorrisvilleschool.blogspot.com/2007/10/are-nsns-losing-it.html
Post a Comment