Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.

Saturday, January 17, 2009

Busing

Neighborhood schools are a longstanding American institution. The idea of busing the students elsewhere has long been controversial, and there's a long list of other resources that can be reviewed covering from the 1950s to 2009.

In Pennsylvania, (correct me if I'm reading something wrong) the law is that elementary students can walk up to 1.5 and secondary up to 2.0 miles.

This leads to the email I received:


Good evening,
I just had a thought. Now that MR Reiter is closed, people living down in parts of Ward 1, by Post Rd., etc. are more than 2.0 miles from their school. This requires that the district institute bussing by law. We have provided the shuttle from Manor Park to MR Reiter in the past, because it is between 2 school buildings AND nobody was >2 miles from MR Reiter. That same argument won't hold up if we are no longer using MR Reiter. This will be an astronomical expense for the district, as they will also have to provide bussing to all private school kids to any academic institution within 10 miles (including NJ). If someone were looking for an argument to build new on the property of MR Reiter, or do a proper renovation, this would be it. Like I said, just a thought...........

Anyone want to add anything? I have reservations about this argument because the consolidated K-12 building would have achieved the same thing that we have today, and I don't think I saw busing mentioned in that plan.

I'm thinking this would also be a huge drain on the savings from farming out the high school students as well.

7 comments:

Jon said...

Here's a link to PA school transportation regs. I suggest everyone read them & learn for themselves what they mean. I'm gonna do the same. If we all go by hearsay and what others tell us they think they mean, we're in trouble....or more trouble.


http://www.pde.state.pa.us
/transportation/lib
/transportation
/SchoolCode_Transportation
_9-25-08.pdf

Save The School said...

Now as a link
http://www.pde.state.pa.us/transportation/lib/transportation/SchoolCode_Transportation_9-25-08.pdf

Jon said...

Thanks, STS.

This reminded me of another topic:

Does anyone know what happened on the "19067 funding formula" issue? Now board-member Jack Buckman frequently raised this as something that shortchanged Morrisville's school funding. He hasn't said much about it since he joined the board, though. Wasn't the board going to hire an enumerator to get to the bottom of it all? Did anything happen, or is this another red herring?

Damon said...

An interpretation of 24 PS 13-1362 Kinds of transportation; liability insurance

"The free transportation of pupils, as required or authorized by this act, or any
other act, may be furnished...when the total
distance which any pupil must travel by the public highway to or from school, in addition to such transportation, does not exceed one and one-half (1 ½) miles,"

The use of the words "may be furnished" in my mind tends to make busing an option and not a requirement if the distance exceeds 1.5 miles. Interested to hear how a solicitor would interpret this.

As far as determining the distance, am I correct in thinking that this calculation must be done from the edge of someone's property along a public highway (neighborhood street?) to the closest edge of the public school property following a path along the streets and not "as the crow flies"?

In other words, if a child living in the Manor area a few blocks off of Pennsylvania Ave (the closest street to connect that area to where the schools are) does the calculation begin at their home (let's say Wright or Hall Ave) and travels out to Penn. Ave up to Bridge Street and then to Barnsley Ave (not the safest way but I'm thinking the most direct) up to Grandview Elem.?

According to Google Maps, this distance equals 1.9 miles. I played around using other routes from these same points and the best I could do is 1.8 miles. BTW approximate walking time is almost 40 minutes.

I even played around with using the Middle/Senior HS as a final destination and the best I could do in mileage was 1.6 miles from the same starting point.

While there may not be any parents who would allow their children to walk this path, especially across the Route 1 ramps, there may come a time when a child is forced to due to a parent's schedule.

If the closing of Reiter is part of the long term plan by this school board, then this issue must be addressed as well as the safety of all of the children in this district. And if busing then becomes necessary, any money saved by the closing of Reiter will be lost to the transportation costs.

What came out of the CAP meetings was to request the school board to look into ALL of the factors in closing a school, not just which facility is better but also the possibility of busing as well as other factors. This board majority has since refused to take that advice, thereby refusing to listen to the public which they promised to do when elected.

Don't all of Morrisville's residents deserve better?

Damon said...

Jon,

According to Mr. Buckman, he and Mr. Hellmann was to meet with Senator McIIhenney with some grant application for this. Never heard if the meeting took place or what the outcome was.

It's a shame the school board can write grants for this and worry about residents not changing their out of state license plates but they can't look into grants for the education of the district's children. This board can't even back the idea of hiring a grant writer that would be paid by the grants they write and the district receives.

Di said...

I, for one, am very interested in the outcome of this, since I am a Ward Oneian.
What are the transportation costs now with the shuttle?

Jon said...

If it (fixing the 19067 funding formula) will save so much Morrisville taxpayer money (i.e. will bring in more state revenues for Morrisville), why wait for a grant to make it happen?

This seems like the perfect thing for some "volunteers" to do.

This hints at a few things:

1. It ain't the issue Buckman made it out to be;

2. This board is too cheap to spend a little money to save more money.

At least we can expect some savings from that nearly-one-year-in-the-making-yet-still-not-ready lighting study.