From the Inquirer. The state's rainy day fund appears poised to be tapped again.
Was there ever any word on the pay increase for our state legislators?
Pa. lawmakers consider tapping surplus funds
By Paul Nussbaum Posted on Mon, Dec. 1, 2008
Facing a growing budget deficit, Pennsylvania lawmakers must consider tapping the state's $750 million "rainy day fund," State Rep. Dwight Evans (D., Phila.), chairman of the House Appropriations Committee, said yesterday.
"This is more than a rainy day; it's a hurricane," Evans said.
The legislature also should consider using its own $240 million surplus fund and the approximately $700 million in legislatively controlled grant money, familiarly known as "walking around money," he said.
Pennsylvania's budget shortfall may be about $2 billion by the end of the fiscal year on June 30, as tax revenues are lagging about 7 percent below projections so far. The state budget is $28.3 billion.
The financial woes of Pennsylvania and other states will take center stage in Philadelphia tomorrow, when President-elect Barack Obama and the nation's governors gather to discuss increased federal aid for states.
Last Monday, Obama asked Congress to ready a stimulus program for him to sign as soon as possible after he takes office Jan. 20. Estimates of the spending range from $500 billion to $700 billion over two years, and Democratic congressional leaders have said some of it could help cash-strapped states provide health care to the poor and pay for road and bridge projects.
Pennsylvania would like to get a commitment of $750 million to $1 billion from Washington, Evans said.
Gov. Rendell is to brief legislative leaders Dec. 9 on the grim state of Pennsylvania's finances.
Rendell already has ordered two spending reductions at state agencies, issued a hiring freeze, and banned state-employee travel and the purchase of new government vehicles.
As the leader of state House budget efforts, Evans said the state should borrow money to spend on road, bridge, and mass-transit projects. That would create needed jobs and shore up the state's crumbling infrastructure, he said.
He said he would reintroduce a bill to lease the Pennsylvania Turnpike to a private operator. A proposal to lease the turnpike to an American-Spanish consortium for $12 billion died in the legislature this year.
Targeted tax increases, but not a general tax increase, also may be considered, Evans said.
"Everything is going to be on the table," Evans said. "We're not going to try to protect anything. . . . I'm not going to say no to anything."
At the same time, the state needs to spend on such things as education and transportation as "investments for the future," Evans said. He said cutbacks for hospitals, nursing homes and the poor should be "the very, very last places we go." He said cuts there would simply transfer the burden to local governments and to overstretched private charities.
"At some point, this will pass, and we will be looking at the future. We need to make Pennsylvania a competitive place to live and work," Evans said.
The state's "rainy day fund" has been tapped before. In 2002, the legislature approved a $750 million withdrawal from the fund, and in 2003, it approved draining the remaining $250 million from the fund.
Contributions over the last five years have brought the fund balance back up to $750 million. A two-thirds majority of each legislative house is required to approve any withdrawal.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
This seems to be one of those times to tap the rainy day fund.
The article says Obama asked Congress for stimulus program with an estimated $500-700 billion in spending over 2 years. It then says Pennsylvania wants a commitment of $750 million to $1 billion from Washington.
Just doing some rough math, PA has a population of ~12 million, the US ~300 million. So, PA has ~4% of the US population. But even the upper range of PA's request ($1 billion) is only 0.2% of the lower range of the federal spending ($500 million). Even if PA's request is for 1 year, and the federal spending covers 2 years, that's still only ~0.4%, about a tenth of what PA should get based on population.
What gives? Are they talking about 2 different pots o'money?
The thread where this really belongs is getting pretty far back, but I watched some of the TV broadcast of the Nov. 19 board meeting, and I wanted to get some thoughts down.
The 501(c)(3), or 501(3)(c) as citizen-participant Mark Coassolo erroneously calls it, needs additional Board of Trustee (BoT) members to be viable. The BoT must have 9 to 17 members, and it's currently about 5 bricks short of a load. People with business experience are desired - probably shoulda thought about that before angering and alienating some key members of the bidness community. Coassolo says the BoT really needs "doers", or did he mean "Dewars"?
The energy-efficient lighting study is moving along at the speed of ....mullusks. After 9+ months, the study for just the Middle-High School is still not complete, but at least some budgetary numbers were tossed around. Estimated cost is $292,700, with estimated savings $40,000/yr. The $292,700 figure allegedly includes a 10% contingency, but volunteer Eric Christensen said the contingency is $29,270, which implies that it isn't included because a 10% contingency on $266,090.90 would make $292,700. Oh well. If you believe the numbers, this would put the payback period in the 7-8 year range, up substantially from the 2.5 year payback he cited at the 2/27/08 board meeting, as shown below:
Eric Christensen, 105 W. Maple
Mr. Christensen outlined his professional experience and qualifications. He offered to perform an energy efficient lighting survey in the high school building at no cost to the district. He will be looking for energy conservation opportunities. Expectations are that there would be a 40% energy savings with a 2.5 year payback.
Gloria Heater asked if the study took into account any changes in windows, walls, skylights, etc. from any renovations or reconfigurations that are done under the elusive "Hellmann Plan". Honestly, how the heck can he take into account something that hasn't been revealed and may not exist?
And more....
Damon Miller spoke against a dress code policy. He also noted that some Special Ed. spending is at 30% of the yearly budget just 2 months into the school year. If the school year is 9 months, you'd expect spending to be tracking at ~22% of the budget. Could be an early warning sign that the board will bust the deliberately underfunded Special Ed. budget. Time will tell.
Ron Stout "read" a prepared statement (nice work, someone other than Ron!) blasting Robin Reithmeyer and her "new school friends" who want the board to further investigate whether to pursue the Plancon process and get some state reimbursement for renovation expenditures. His rationale, as best I can tell, was:
1. The 2005 Feasibility Study (which ironically he now cites as legitimate) indicated a $15 million cost ($13.5 million after $1.5 million in state reimbursement) to renovate. Morrisville can't afford it and it's not necessary;
2. We don't need another Feasibility Study;
3. Robin's "new school friends" lost overwhelmingly in the May 2007 primary and November 2007 general elections, so their ideas and opinions must not have any validity;
4. The board's spending $4 million in renovations now, and Robin and her "new school friends" need to just cooperate and start helping out, because we've got serious budget problems here.
I don't know how I did it, but I managed to not make him sound like the bumbling buffoon that he, in my humble opinion, sadly is.
Oh, and then Marlys Mihok, like Fonzie, admitted she was Wrrrrrrr.....Wrrrrrrrr
Wrrrrrrr......WRONG about the 50-year old black pipe at the Middle-High School. Apparently, she researched it more after she voted to spend mucho dinero to replace it without testing it first. She found out it doesn't necessarily need replacing at 50-years, if it hasn't been exposed to oxygen. Of all things, she should know that! Now if she and other like-minded board members could just do their "research" before they vote. Baby steps, baby steps. Oh, and don't even think about claiming this as a cost savings, as you started to do at the meeting. This was a near-miss money wastage, not a savings! As The Fonz sez: Ayyyyyyyyyyy! Now if only the Fonz could do some of his patented free "percussive maintenance" on the schools.
Oh, and Ron Stout also called upon the "new school friends" network to do their proper due diligence, evidently to determine as he, or whomever may have written the remarks for him, has that the school board doesn't need to do theirs. Therefore, no further investigation will be done into whether taxpayer money can be saved by following the state's Plancon process for the $4 million in Middle-High-Elementary? "renovations" on tap.
The best defense is a good offense, and you can't say he isn't on the offensive. In psychological terms, his schtick is called projection, a defense mechanism in which one attributes oneʼs own unacceptable or unwanted thoughts or/and emotions to others.
Post a Comment