Another editorial from the BCCT this morning. The attention on our plight is appreciated, but what does it really accomplish?
Sometimes the "just the facts" approach doesn't tell the whole story. There are times when I watch the tape and re-read the printed story and wonder why "less is more." The printed story may be factually unassailable. However, it's not a complete representation of what is unfolding.
For example, let's look at some of the recent stories. "Morrisville's tax reduction is the exception in the area, with most other districts experiencing some sort of tax increase." Why was defeasement not mentioned as the reason for the large tax decrease?
"Hellmann thinks certain expenditures have been padded so there is more money in the budget, making it a kind of wish list...Yonson has expressed frustration with this view on several occasions and stressed that the administration has specified only a “bare-bones budget.” You just printed two diametrically opposed viewpoints. Let someone who knows school budgets in the area take a look at the two viewpoints, compare them with the actual Morrisville budget, and let us know who is right. At least let us know who is more right. Either Dr. Yonson or Mr. Hellmann is making the mis-characterization.
"Posted in News on Thursday, June 26th, 2008 at 3:01 pm by Columnist Kate Fratti: Morrisville School Board member Joe Kemp today in an email urged the board majority, yet again, to do its homework before committing the troubled district to big change." What does federal, state or local law require to be done to successfully farm out the students? Are you ready to press a Sunshine Law challenge to the well-documented secrecy from this board?
"Board President William Hellmann did not provide a concrete reason for shortening her contract. He thanked Yonson for doing an exemplary job and said a shorter contract was a better choice. Yonson herself said it was an irregular course of action. After their first contract expires, most Bucks superintendents who get their contracts renewed do receive five-year contracts, she said." Well? Who is correct, Hellmann or Yonson?
This isn't Watergate and we don't need Woodward and Bernstein style reporting. But while you're here, can you turn over a few rocks and let us know what crawls out?
Intentions unknown
Withering away?
As the Morrisville school board pecks away at the schools, parents rightfully worry about the quality of the schools. What does the future hold?
Anger, resentment and frustration are boiling over in Morrisville. School board meetings are nearly out of control as citizens find creative ways to disrupt business. In addition to bickering among board members, meetings drag on and on. Last week’s session lasted five grueling and rambunctious hours.
Still, you can hardly blame citizens for acting out.
The majority members of the school board were elected on the promise they’d stop construction of a new K-12 school, a $30 million project that was the subject of contentious debate itself. That citizens replaced the old board with one opposed to the new school can be considered a de facto referendum on the issue. Sick and tired of ever-spiraling school taxes, most citizens viewed the new school as too costly and unnecessary. That much is clear.
What’s not clear is the school board’s long-range plan. Are members committed to the schools?
We raise the question because the school board appears to be pecking away at the district, seeking to shorten the superintendent’s contract, investigating opportunities to export high school students to other districts, refusing to fill open positions.
What’s the plan? Is the board’s goal to shut down the high school, perhaps all the schools?
Citizens have a right to know. Parents are rightly concerned about the quality of education as the district is slowly disassembled — if that’s what’s happening. And so they’re jamming meetings in a frantic effort to stymie a board that appears to have little concern about the children they’re responsible for educating.
Elected officials deserve to function amid conditions conducive to thoughtful decision making. But officials need to demonstrate thoughtful concern for the people they represent by being open, honest and forthcoming.
“We’re doing the best we can with the resources we have” isn’t a good enough answer — not when the board takes actions that suggest there’s a lot more explaining to do. It’s time for school board President William Hellmann to address the question openly and honestly.
Tuesday, July 1, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
14 comments:
I wonder how these people sleep at night. When they see their neighbors, are they ashamed? Or is their hubris such that it has become impenetrable?
Galatians 6: 7-8
Do not be deceived: God cannot be mocked. A man reaps what he sows.
The one who sows to please his sinful nature, from that nature will reap destruction; the one who sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
The BCCT does a pretty good job of stirring the pot and avoiding being scalded by the steam. The editorial staff sits in their ivory tower and pass judgement without getting their hands dirty.
Hellmann should do this, the people should get along and respect the board, this should be done in public, blah, blah, blah.
While they easily make their "opinion" known, they rarely hold anyone's feet to the fire. When past boards developed unpopular construction plans, or cut programs, or allowed a charter school, or held meetings in secret, the BCCT editorial staff said 'shame, shame'. But no real press to change things was made, no in-depth reporting on the issues. Maybe it is because Morrisville, as small and seperatists as it is, easily holds off against outside opinion, but I don't think so. I've seen this happen in OpEd over Tullytown, Bristol, Bensalem and Falls as well.
The only "light" I find in the BCCT opinion slanted publishing is in the editors support of columnists like Fratti and Mullane. But even these have to divide their attention over several boroughs, and cannot give the in-depth attention to critical issue reporting that is neccessary.
I applaud Fratti for continuing to keep an eye on Morrisville and for occasionally holding feet to the fire. Sadly, it is not enough.
In reply to anonymous II: I'm not a believer, but I do believe that many philosophies that have stood the test of time do reveal a kind of truth. Regarding the quote, it describes, in reverse, my reason for staying on the board and not feeling the shame I've been ordered to feel over my previous decisions in a majority. That was a terrible sentence. I'll try again.
I pissed off a lot of people by supporting the school construction project. I understood it to be the best of a list of difficult choices for the future of the district. I heard and felt for every person with a sad story about the impact of the taxes that the project imposed, but I thought it had to be done. I thought it was in the best interest of the town and the students. I can sleep at night, sometimes fitfully, but I know I did the right thing for the most people.
Do the rest of the board feel this way? I don't know. I also don't know if Galatians is right. It seems that in the real world, people who do things with bad intentions don't always (or often) get their comeuppance. Post-life doesn't mean anything to me.
The fear now in the Kemp household is that they'll win and we'll be stuck. I'm drawing lines. People who support the school district and people who want it to go away. Are we going to end up with a crappy school district AND depressed home values because of it? Those of us who want to educate our children in public schools (because we think that raises the bar for everyone) will be out of luck. Can't stay here, can't afford to move. The people who have no intention of ever moving or using the schools won't care. The people who buy up properties at low, low prices won't care. In fact, it's in their interest to keep the housing market down in our town. that seems to be the answer to the big "why?" question. Why oppose revitalization, why oppose a good school district?
Any other ideas?
From yesterday's Phila. Inquirer. Sounds like the $290 million in extra education funding in the PA may survive relatively intact.
Pa. legislative leaders, administration reach budget deal
By Angela Couloumbis
INQUIRER HARRISBURG BUREAU
HARRISBURG – Legislative leaders and Rendell administration officials struck a compromise on a state budget early this morning, all but ensuring that there will be no furloughs of state employees and shutdown of government services.
The two sides emerged from hours-long talks shortly after 1 a.m., saying they had agreed on a $28.2 billion budget that provides roughly $290 million in new state aid for school districts as well as $650 million for investments in energy conservation and clean energy projects without increasing taxes.
Although the legislature will not have enough time to approve the spending plan before tomorrow's start of the new fiscal year, the agreement reached this morning is a near-guarantee that there will not be a repeat of last year's one-day furlough of 24,000 state workers.
"This was a very difficult budget, and we had our disagreements," Gov. Rendell said this morning at a news conference, adding that it required both sides to make concessions. "But there was a great spirit of cooperation . . . and we continue to make progress even in a tough budget year."
Rendell said that it was a difficult time to broker a deal, given the economic downturn that has touched almost every segment of society, including government.
He said that the state's projected surplus was less than what his administration had initially thought it would be. That, in turn, required that the two sides make difficult budget cuts totaling $545 million.
It also meant some creative financing ideas.
To make ends meet, the sides agreed to transfer at least $60 million from surpluses in special accounts, including the liquor store system and the recycling fund, to cover general state spending needs. This year, the state lottery fund will pick up $50 million in nursing home and other costs typically covered by general appropriations.
The state also will forgo this year's contribution to its reserve fund, called the Rainy Day fund.
Given that bleak financial backdrop, Senate Majority Leader Dominic Pileggi (R., Delaware) said reaching a budget agreement this year was "an achievement in and of itself."
And not an easy one, added Rep. Dwight Evans (D., Phila.), who chairs the House Appropriation Committee.
"Everybody had to give up something," Evans said of the compromise.
The two sides began their talks yesterday shortly after 5:30 p.m. with a number of issues still dividing them. Among them was Rendell's proposal for an extra $291 million for school districts – the largest increase in education funding in two decades. Rendell this morning said that the education funding will remain "basically the same."
One difference: Parties agreed to guarantee that all public district – including wealthier ones -- get at least a 3-percent increase in state funding this year, up from the 1 ½ percent guaranteed under Rendell's initially proposal.
Other disagreements included billions of dollars in borrowing to help replace aging municipal water and sewer facilities, invest in clean energy projects and fix some of the state's structurally deficient bridges.
Rendell also said the budget, which contains no tax increase, includes $350 million to repair about 400 structurally deficient bridges and $800 million for water and sewer system upgrades over the next several years.
But other details were hard to come by. The agreement represents a broad framework and its fine print will now have to be worked out by legislative and administrative staffers.
In all, this fiscal year's budget represents a 3.8 percent increase over last year's spending. The overall amount is about $120 million less than Rendell first proposed in February.
Contact staff writer Angela Couloumbis at 717-787-5934 or acouloumbis@phillynews.com.
Staff writer Mario F. Cattabiani also contributed to this article.
Douglas Hagrid – School Board Candidate?
I’ve considered that I might make a good school board candidate, and wanted to know what people think. I’ve been a Morrisville resident since 2001. I have a large family – four kids of school age
My qualities are more personal than professional, though I’ve had experience in many fields. I’m well liked in general by my neighbors, though I think a few find me a bit too forward. I am a team player, and loyal to my community; in fact I prefer working in groups. However, I am brave when I need to be, and willing to lead in a crisis. I have no formal background in education or business, but I am well rounded. I’d say my finest education was in the form of private tutoring that my family was fortunate enough to afford.
I am willing to work hard for a good cause, and I love children. What do you think?
The Courier Times does stir the pot then leave, but that is kind of their job. If the focus on education is to improve in Morrisville, it's up to the residents, not the Courier Times, to bring about change.
Our goal as a community should not be to simply cut taxes but rather to insure that tax money is spent wisely, responsibly. For those who say "cut, cut, cut", they don't care about the future of Morrisville. They and this school board would rather turn this place into a ghost town than to spend one dime of improving education.
Those who can afford to move out will do so. The people moving in will be the people who aren't concerned about children's education (or why would they move here?) and are looking for "affordable" housing. This school board isn't stabilizing the local economy - they're setting in motion a strategy that will gut this community through economic mismanagement. If you think your property values are low now, just wait another ten years. You'll probably find yourself in a negative equity situation.
Nice going.
Dear Douglas Hagrid:
What are your views on the current school situation? I know this sounds like an insane question but who do you think is your first priority if elected, children or senior citizens? Do you believe that all children are entitled to a Free Appropriate Public Education? If elected and you vote or support by your actions to under funded the special education budget who should be held liable in a court of law:
(1) the teacher who attempts to educate all children with limited resources
(2) the new special education coordinator who is offered a bonus to deny education services in the IEP
(3) Fat Cat school board member who took the position to benefit themselves and lower their taxes.
This time I will ask the right questions and wait for the appropriate answers before I blindly vote. I thought any change has to be better than Sandy Gibson, I was dead wrong.
Hagrid,
I don't think you should be asking that question here.
Neither should you ask it at a board meeting, or a council meeting.
You should go to the PTA, go to the parents, go to the taxpayers, go to the administrators, go to all parties who have a stake in Morrisville and public education in Morrisville and ask them. Ask what they want to see done. Ask what will help this district and boro to drag itself out of the muck and mud and reach its potential.
Then, after you have asked those questions, and heard all of the various answer, if you feel you can do something about it by being on the board, and can be fair, open and thoughtful, then go for it.
Dear "stop the school" residents,
Could you please explain in plain simple English what you want the Boro of Morrisville to become? Not just the school but the entire town. I would just love to hear some honest answers, even if it sounds awful, I want to hear it.
It can't be any worse than what my imagination has created.
I think we (the save the school people)have been really naive about Morrisville. We've been trying to better our community as a whole & the people who run it could care less about improvement.
Some from the other side may speak about revitalization, but their actions have been completely against it.
I've even heard the Morrisville Chapter of the Lion's Club has disbanded because of the insanity in dealing with this town. See the Lion's Club is a wonderful organization that wants to help communties, I guess we are truly hopeless.
Douglas, I agree with H. Potter that you need to speak with all of those people. I'd start with the PTA/Parent Advisory Council (although school's out). If you've been reading then I think you already know what most people here think.
You do not need formal training in any certain area, business or otherwise, although that can come in handy, but life experience is also useful.
There are several readers here that have served previously (or currently as in at least one case). I'm guessing STS knows how to get in touch with most, or can find out, so feel free to reach out if you would like to know more about what the job entails.
I'd definitely consider the Fat Cat!
It is my understanding that the Rotary Club may not be far behind. Nationally recognized organizations see that we have no future. Doesn't that tell you something. Morrisville, you better do something, because Trenton is getting closer, and closer, and closer, and closer......
...we will just need to check for residency! Trenton can't come in here as long as we do that!
Post a Comment