Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Math Wars

I know more than a few parents who have fought this battle

Frustrated parents sneak 'old math' to kids
NEW YORK (AP) -- On an occasional evening at the kitchen table in Brooklyn, New York, Victoria Morey has been known to sit down with her 9-year-old son and do something she's not supposed to.

Brigitta Stone struggles to help Gillian with homework but doesn't want to confuse her with old math methods.

"I am a rebel," confessed this mother of two.

And just what is this subversive act in which Morey engages -- with a child, yet?

Long division.

Yes, Morey teaches her son, who'll enter fifth grade in the fall, how to divide the old-fashioned way -- you know, with descending columns of numbers, subtracting all the way down. It's a formula that works, and she finds it quick, reliable, even soothing. So, she says, does her son.

But in his fourth-grade class, long division wasn't on the agenda. As many parents across the country know, this and some other familiar formulas have been supplanted in an increasing number of schools by concept-based curricula aiming to teach the ideas behind mathematics rather than rote procedures.

They call it the Math Wars: The debate, at times acrimonious, over which way is best to teach kids math. In its most black-and-white form, it pits schools hoping to prepare kids for a new world against reluctant parents who feel that the traditional way is best and that their kids are being shortchanged.

But there are lots of parents who fall into a grayer area: They're willing to accept that their kids are learning things differently. They just want to be able to help them with their homework. And very often, they can't.

"Sometimes I'll meet up with another parent, and we'll say, 'What WAS that homework last night?' " said Birgitta Stone, whose daughter, Gillian, is entering third grade in Ridgefield, Connecticut, next month. "Sometimes I can't even understand the instructions."

Funny, perhaps, but also a little sad. "It's frustrating," Stone said. "You want to help them. And sometimes I can't help her at all."

Still, Stone agrees that kids should be thinking differently about math. And so she doesn't interfere by teaching her kid the old ways. "I don't want to confuse her," she said.

Morey, on the other hand, feels no guilt. She says her son was relieved to learn long division. "He wants a quick and easy way to get the right answer," she said. "Luckily, he had a fabulous teacher who said long division wasn't in her plan, but we were free to do what we wanted at home."

And as for the concepts-before-procedure argument, she quipped: "Would you want to go to a doctor who's learned about the concepts but never done the surgery? Would you want your doctor to say, 'I had the right idea when I removed your appendix, though I took out the wrong one?' "

Such reasoning is not unfamiliar to Pat Cooney. As the math coordinator for six public schools in Ridgefield, which over the past two years have implemented the Growing in Math curriculum, she's seen a lot of angry parents.

"I had one parent who was probably as angry as a parent could be," Cooney said. "I've had irate phone calls. Some think we're giving the kids misinformation. They think we're not doing our jobs."

One problem, Cooney says, is that parents remember math as offering only one way to solve a problem.

"We're saying that there's more than one way," Cooney said. "The outcome will be the same, but how we get there will be different."

Thus, when a parent is asked to multiply 88 by 5, we'll do it with pen and paper, multiplying 8 by 5 and carrying over the 4, etc. But a child today might reason that 5 is half of 10, and 88 times 10 is 880, so 88 times 5 is half of that, 440 -- poof, no pen, no paper.

"The traditional way is really a shortcut," Cooney said. "We want kids to be so confident with numbers that it becomes intuitive."

As for parents, Cooney hopes that if they're teaching kids at home, at least it won't be "let me show you how you really do it," she said. She's spending the rest of her summer working on plans for more family nights at school, to better explain the system.

The "Math Wars" have been playing out since at least 1989, when the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics issued a document recommending concept-based teaching -- which was, the group says, distorted by critics and "exaggerated in every direction."

"Our position is that math ought to be reasonable and kids ought to be able to make sense of it," saidHank Kepner, president of the council and a teacher for the past 45 years.

The problem, he says, is that "a lot of adults view math as a cut-and-dried thing, not a method of reasoning." As for parents enforcing their own methods on kids, "You don't want a kid pitted between parent and teacher," he said. "I would hope there would be an open conversation, involving the teacher." But ultimately, "the more adults a kid sees talking about math, the better."

Sam Pennell, 10, of Brooklyn, hears about math a lot: His dad, Mark, is an architect, and father and son have been known to discuss the volumes of cylinders to be filled with concrete. "He understands the concept of pi," Mark Pennell said of his son. "He doesn't question it too much."

Since Sam is good at math, his father supplements his classroom work with, for example, the old way of multiplying 175 times 142. "I'm doing this to broaden his perspective, to keep him from getting bored," Pennell said. He thinks Sam could be challenged more at school but otherwise isn't hugely bothered by the concept-based curriculum.

His wife, though, finds it mystifying. A writer with degrees from Barnard and Stanford, she still finds herself flummoxed by her son's schoolwork.

"There never seems to be any explanation in the workbooks," Allison Pennell said. "And there's no textbook to refer to." Her son doesn't usually need her help, but when he does, she said, "I'm such a numbskull. I don't think I could pass fourth-grade math."

For teacher Melissa Hedges, a longtime elementary school teacher in Milwaukee, the key is to keep the lines of communication open.

"I'll ask parents to sit down and really have their child walk through what they're doing and why they're doing it," Hedges said. "Even if it's messy. The beauty in math comes from getting involved, knowing what you're doing and why, exploring big ideas."

Remember, Hedges said, "in the end, we're all after the same thing. Sometimes it's easy to lose that focus."

4 comments:

john ceneviva said...

I have a friend who tells me she gave up on math when the letters were introduced in Algebra. She was very good in English and didn't understand why letter from her English class suddenly got up and invaded her math class. She wanted them to back to English where they belonged.

For me, some of the math and finance terms that should be understood by homeowners and school board members just aren't. I found myself so frustrated that I was nearly crying during the board meeting when no one except Ms. Dunford understood what a mil is. Everyone in Morrisville should have been embarrassed when BCT put a little square in the paper as a reminder. Why is it that only she remembered the term "defeasement"? Is she the only person on the dais who understands it?

Mil is a term that should be understood by every homeowner. Defeasement should be understood by every board member.

I applaud Mr. Farrell for being honest when he said he couldn't make heads or tails of the cost of the engineering proposals. I'm sure he wasn't the only one on the board. But was he the only person who got his hands on them? Mr. Hellmann seems to filter such proposals to his friends only. Did the rest of the board members who got the proposals understand them?

If not, I can understand Mr. Hellmann's up or down vote on Vitetta. He liked their proposal and the rest couldn't (or couldn't be bothered) to make sense of it.

What frightens me most is the amounts of money being tossed about by people who might not understand household budgets. No one asks the basic questions like, "what is the long-term plan for this spending? and where does this current spending fit in?" I would certainly be less critical of the board if there was a public plan that showed the direction the schools were heading.

I worry that the Vitetta firm will find many more problems that we will need to deal with. Or that they will find problems and Hellmann will not inform anyone.

Anonymous said...

I heard Johnson and Johnson has been contacted! We need three years worth of band-aids,til we can farm out the kids!

Jon said...

I'm sorry, but I don't feel so generous towards Mr. Farrell for saying he couldn't make heads or tails of the cost of the engineering proposals. It sounds like some proposals were based on $ amounts, and others (or at least one) were based on "% of construction cost". That doesn’t sound like rocket science to me. It's simple mathematics. Declaring your ignorance in a proud defiant tone doesn't make you a hero in my book. Making yourself less ignorant would be more commendable.

The engineering proposals that Mr. Farrell found incomprehensible were the ones solicited by Reba Dunford using the proper process which, if followed, would have costs reimbursable by the state.

It wouldn't have been very difficult or time-consuming to get the bidders to synchronize their bids to a common standard (e.g. $) so that an apples-to-apples comparison could be made. We already missed this coming heating season anyway, so an extra month or 2 to do things properly wouldn't have jeopardized anything.

Some board members showed some independence from Hellmann in their public statements (and by adding MR Reiter to the mix). That's good. But by plowing ahead the way it did, the board wasted money. Again. From the 2005 Feasibility Study - the one that has been frequently derided as flimsy and inadequate but that now looks like War and Peace compared to anything this board has produced - state reimbursement was generally 10% or more of project costs. So if we spend $1 million on this work, we stand to flush away > $100,000 in state reimbursement. $2 million = $200,000 flushed, and so on......

Anonymous said...

Perhaps these people should have paid more attention in algebra class. Then they might understand simple mathematics and numerical relationships. Maybe now they see the value. Oh, who am I kidding? Actually my guess is that they are simply too lazy to try to understand a budget.