Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Bucks a pricey place to live for seniors

Another dispatch from the front lines of everyday life posted by Captain Obvious. I sit here watching the gas prices approach and overwhelm the $4.00 mark. When the oil company comes to fill my fuel oil tank, I wonder if they should be wearing a mask and carrying a gun. Ditto for the cashier at the local grocery store. It's not just an "elderly" problem, but it hits the fixed income people pretty hard.

I'm not indifferent to the plight of the elderly. I once lived next door to an old widow. She had been in her home since the mid 1940s, and alone since her husband died in the mid 1970s. I knew her for about the last ten years of her life. My family, and the other neighbors, did what we could. We made sure her walks and driveway were shoveled and the grass mowed. We invited her to dinners in a round robin format so that at least one or two full meals a week were a guarantee, in addition to the Meals on Wheels she received. We did repairs on her house as if it was our own.

She should have moved into an assisted living facility, but the waiting list was too long and once she got to the top, even with selling her house, the price was too much to bear. She was not on good terms with her children and steadfastly refused the many entreaties from them for her to come live with them. It would have meant a move to Kentucky or Oregon depending on the child she chose, but she wanted her own home.

Was that a smart decision? I don't know. It wasn't my decision to make. I think emotion played a much larger role in this decision than a clearheaded and sober evaluation of the realities.

Retirement planning is a tricky piece of work. Many a nest egg was wiped out in the Great Depression, the 1970s recession, and other lesser economic downturns. It will be no different this time around. The economic laws are pretty brutal and inflexible.

Retirement is something that lives in a galaxy far, far away. Until the day it knocks on the door and shouts, "Surprise!" Americans in general are the proverbial grasshopper, not saving for a rainy day, but existing in the present. As the Boomers edge into retirement, I wonder how many of them are ready. I've already seen too many people mentioning that they will need to work until they die.

The answer is not to starve and to price fixed income seniors out of their own homes. But is the answer to provide handouts at the expense of the rest of the community? The Social Security taxes I pay are crippling on their own, and what will be my return on that money? My estimates are zero, and falling. The home mortgage speculators are looking for government handouts to bail them out of their greedy short sighted decisions. The homeowners who bought more house than they could afford also need to be held accountable. I'd like to tell them all to take a flying leap. They made their beds and didn't share the gains when times were good. Why do they want a handout now when times are bad?

Do you have any solutions?


Bucks a pricey place to live for seniors


By CRISSA SHOEMAKER DEBREE
Bucks County Courier Times

Senior citizens living in Bucks and Montgomery counties need almost twice their annual Social Security payments to live comfortably in their homes — and that's if they're healthy.

In fact, the two counties are behind only Chester as the most expensive counties for seniors to live in, according to the Elder Economic Security Standard, a joint publication between a national nonprofit group and university researchers.

You don't have to tell Pauline Bailey that. The 83-year-old widow from Warrington relies solely on Social Security.

“I cut down on what I can,” she said. “But you can only do so much.”

Bailey volunteers at the Benjamin Wilson Senior Community Center in Warminster, where she goes twice a week for lunch. She keeps the heat low and has cut back on errands.

But that doesn't help when she's paying $4.79 a gallon for heating oil. It cost her almost $800 to fill half a tank — and gasoline is just as high.

According to the Elder Economic Security Standard, a Bucks County resident like Bailey — a single senior living in a home she owns mortgage-free — needs $20,701 a year just to pay basic living expenses. The average Social Security payment, meanwhile, is $14,053.

“This is as fixed [an income] as you can get,” said Neil Fisher, director of the Warminster senior center.

Somerset County in southwestern Pennsylvania and Union County in central Pennsylvania were the cheapest counties in the state to live in. An individual senior still paying a mortgage could get by in both counties with $18,324 a year. A couple in the same situation would need $26,491. Both those amounts are still several thousand dollars more than the average Social Security payment, the index says.

Wider Opportunities for Women, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit, launched the Elder Economic Security Initiative in 2005. The ultimate goal is to have a national database on living costs for every county in the U.S., said Ramsey Alwin, the initiative's director.

The index was developed by the organization and the Gerontology Institute at the University of Massachusetts-Boston.

In Pennsylvania, the organization is partnered with Pathways PA and the United Way of Southeastern Pennsylvania.

For seniors in good health, the greatest expense is housing, Alwin said. But their costs of living can triple quickly if they fall ill, she said. Adding home-based assistance or going into a nursing home can add $6,514 to $35,241 a year to a senior's cost in Bucks County, the index shows.

“Some of this data oftentimes is not a surprise to some of the direct-service providers,” Alwin said. “But it does quantify what they've known to be true for a long time, and plays a critical role in helping seniors identify [that] it's not their fault. They're suffering in silence, not wanting to go get help. It's very clear that their incomes are coming up short.”

Alwin said the index doesn't include small luxuries like leisure spending.

“It is a barebones budget,” she said. “It doesn't include gifts for the grandchildren, a night out for pizza, or [a movie at] Blockbuster. It's true income and health security.”

Brian Duke, director of the Area Agency on Aging in Bucks County, said the number of seniors struggling financially is increasing. The agency connects them to services for help.

“We have heard stories of people that have been challenged with day-to-day living expenses,” he said. “We try to assist them here.”

Alwin said the goal of the initiative is to help seniors make informed financial decisions, and to help policy makers shape programs to assist seniors.

Daniel Goldsmith of Horsham said something has to be done about gas prices.

The 76-year-old retiree said it's becoming increasingly difficult to live on what he gets from Social Security, a pension from Lockheed Martin and interest on savings.

The pension never increases, the interest on his savings is decreasing and Social Security isn't rising fast enough to cover price increases in food and other necessities, he said.

“I have enough to survive, but it's becoming tougher and tougher and tougher,” he said. “Everything is going up. But my income is not increasing that much. At some point, I'm not going to be able to make ends meet anymore. Then what will I do?”

Where to get help

If you're a senior in need of financial or other assistance, contact the Bucks County Area Agency on Aging at 215-348-0510 or the Montgomery County Office of Aging and Adult Services at 610-278-3601.

On the Web

Find out more about the Elder Economic Security Initiative at http://www.pathwayspa.org/.

2 comments:

Peter said...

While we like to think of things on a local level, this is a national, if not global, issue.

The U.S. Census from 1960 shows that 27.26% of the total population was school age, between ages of 5 and 19, while 9.12% of the population was 65 and older. Compare this data to the 2000 Census and one finds that the school age population drops to 21.78% while the 65 and older population climbs to 12.43%. This drop in birth rate and increase in life expectancy has created challenges to retirement pension plans, including Social Security, posing risks to their solvency and threatening their very existence. Because of this, many employers stopped offering pensions years ago, instead moving toward 401K or other retirement plans, and some simply stopped offering any retirement benefits at all. Many that do offer some plan are beginning to implement an "opt-out" plan for new hires with the thinking that people will find it easier to save for retirement if they never see that extra income in the first place. That's probably wise, but it doesn't help today's seniors.

This shift in ages is due to the advancements in medicine, of course, with life expectancy rising from 69.7 in 1960 to 75.4 in 2000 to about 78 years in 2007. With these advancements come costs, both for the medicine itself, but more and more for insurance to cover America's growing hunger for frivilous litigation.

Additionally, consider that the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the same period (1960 to 2000) has gone up an astounding 481%. In the last 10 years, gas prices have gone up over 350% and from 1960 to the present they have gone up well over 1000%. And of course, rising gas prices means that everything else -- from groceries to household goods to rubber chickens -- goes up with it because so much is transported by truck.

I don't think there are any clear or easy answers on what to do about this. Social Security was a brilliant idea of its time but it did not account for the generational shift shown above.

Jon said...

What's this "pension" thing the 76-year-old retiree is talking about?

Seriously though, I agree with Peter that this is a national, if not global issue. In the U.S., the gap between rich and poor has widened substantially since the 1970's. In the period between about 1929 and the early 1970's, wealth inequality in the U.S. was down or fairly flat, and the American middle class grew significantly.

I attribute most of this widening gap to U.S. tax policies, and the decline/reversal of the FDR "New Deal" and LBJ "Great Society" programs that had the overall effect of redistributing income from richer to poorer.

Tax rates used to be much more progressive. For example, during the Truman, Eisenhower, and Kennedy administrations, the highest marginal income tax rate was over 90% (versus 35% today), and it remained at or above 70% through 1980. Top tax rates dropped most significantly under Reagan, came back up a bit during Bush I and Clinton, only to drop again under Bush II.

I'm not saying all of these social programs were great, or that lower taxes are bad. I'm just saying that over the last 30 years or so, tax policies have favored the rich getting richer and the poor getting poorer (or barely treading water). And I think we're seeing some of the effects of that here in Morrisville.

I think that while it might sound great to drop taxes on the rich in the hopes of it trickling down to us and making us rich too, it also widens the gap between the "haves" and the "have-nots" and destabilizes our society and communities. America is a democracy with a still large middle class, so maybe the effects here don't seem as striking, but look at how hard China's leadership is trying to maintain stability in a rapidly industrializing nation with vast gaps between rich and poor. No government has survived long-term with vast rich-poor wealth gaps.