You talkin' to me?
Yeah. I'm talkin' to you.
If you're angry, irritated, infuriated, exasperated, aggravated, upset, wound up, bothered, maddened, frustrated, displeased, provoked, riled, incensed, cheesed off, put out, hacked off, narked, ticked off, dissatisfied, discontented, disaffected, displeased; fretful, complaining, querulous, pettish, testy, petulant, cranky; chafed, annoyed, piqued, vexed, aggravated, amplified, angry, anxious, augmented, beset, bothered, browned-off, bugged, burnt-up, chafed, deliberately provoked, distressed, disturbed, embarrassed, embittered, enhanced, enlarged, exacerbated, exasperated, galled, griped, harassed, heated up, heightened, hotted up, huffy, inconvenienced, increased, intensified, irked, irritated, magnified, miffed, nettled, peeved, perturbed, piqued, plagued, provoked, put-out, put to it, puzzled, resentful, riled, roiled, ruffled, sore beset, soured, troubled, vexed, worried, worse, worsened, or something else in that general mood, then you're exactly the one I want to talk to.
The problem is that I need you to take action. Are you ready? Thanks to jon for providing this comprehensive list of the Hellmann Administration's successes so far:
1. Hire a note-taker for Marlys;
2. Pay back this year's portion of the $2.4 million bond defeasement costs;
3. Pay this year's costs to switch banks to satisfy Bill Hellmann's vendetta against the original bond broker, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
4. Pay for the $2,500 flimsy unauthorized study Hellmann unilaterally commissioned on the Middle-High School;
5. Pay for $8,000 in similar flimsy studies Hellmann wants to do on the elementary schools, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
6. Pay for the ~$200,000 in repairs to the Middle-High School mentioned in the flimsy unauthorized $2,500 study above that Hellmann claimed were safety-related but Dr. Yonson, Reba Dunford, the District's maintenance guy, and about 15 other engineering firms indicated are not - again, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
7. Pay again to fix the doors at MR Reiter that were not fixed properly on the cheap in another unilateral move by Hellmann and will now have to be re-done, at a greater cost than the original estimate.
I know there's more. But isn't this enough?
The parents WILL be shut out of the decision process unless you take action now.
Tell the board you are disgusted with their antics so far. You can do it by email or by telling them face to face at one of the opportunities listed below:
**Parent Advisory, Tuesday March 11, 6:00 P.M. in the MHS LGI
**Infrastructure and Finance Committee Meetings, Wednesday March 12 at 6:30 and 7:00 P.M. MHS G-Hall conference room.
**Board of Ed Agenda Meeting, Wednesday March 12, 7:30 P.M. MHS LGI
**Education and Human Resources Committee Meetings, Wednesday March 26 at 6:30 and 7:00 P.M. MHS G-Hall conference room.
**Board of Ed Business Meeting, Wednesday March 26, 7:30 P.M. in the MHS LGI
Your silence or inaction gives them the courage to continue their disregard for the parents as an integral part of the education process. Don't let that happen.
Tuesday, March 11, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
20 comments:
One correction - I said "next month's" board meeting for a few items (#3, #5, and #6), but it's really "this month's" board meeting, which is scheduled for Wednesday, March 26.
This Wednesday's (March 12) agenda meeting is when these items could be placed on the agenda for a vote at the March 26th mtg.!
From now on, Jon shall be known as By-Tor. He shall unleash the fury of the Snowdog upon the heathens, and they shall quake in fear of his might and political acumen.
When did the school board start holding agenda meetings? What's next? They can't seem to make the regular meetings. This should end well.
Thanks - it's an op-Peart-unity of a Lifeson, and I'm Geddy with excitement.
They decided to hold agenda meetings because Boro Council does it. That is the only reason they have ever publicly cited for this enormous waste of time each month.
Jon, you are quite the punster. Sandy, thanks for that answer. Perhaps someone should explain that time does not equal effort, and meetings do not equal action nor results.
OH! one more for Jon: You'd think that being in the limelight, the new board would recognize the distant early warning of the dangers of using fly by night tactics and creating further subdivisions within the community. They seem to think they can climb jacob's ladder to xanadu. When in fact they are more likely to wind up in La Villa Strangiato. Why are they always beneath, between and behind? If they're not careful, they'll find themselves the targets of a new Bastille day.
I've sent emails, I received no response! I can only imagine the body language on Mr. Hellman if I got up and spoke at the meetings. He doesn't listen to what anyone has to say, he is the ONLY one fiddling with paperwork everytime someone says something that isn't on his agenda! HELL YEAH I am all the underlined words, but where do I go from here?
We need to stand up there at every meeting and be as in your face as the STS candidates were. I think its called the Gibson rule here?
All these puns are giving me a....wait for it....Rush.Time to hop in the ol red Barchetta and jet.
Yeah, the old red barchetta might take you straight to Cygnus X-1. But Entre Nous, I don't think it would make it. It's more of an Anthem to the Working Man. A better idea might be to take the Passage to Bangkok, just be careful you don't end up in the Twilight Zone.
You could always take off to the Great White North. Beauty, eh?
It might not be as big a waste of time if they would actually publish the agenda beforehand so the public knows what B.S. is coming and can prepare for it.
See how easy that is? All I did was mention on a blog that it would be nice to have the meeting agenda online and *poof* just like magic, here they are!
So, let's try my luck again... I wish... I wish... I wish I will win the Powerball.
I notice that the agenda calls for the approval of six (6) different sets of minutes from previous meetings.
I hope the board gets these well in advance, as undoubtedly there is a lot to read before approving them without ammendment.
My best guess, something is going to be slipped in; an attempt to pull the wool over everyone's eyes and to say, "Oh yes! that was approved. It's in the minutes."
Now all we need to wish for is the details of the motions beforehand. What are 4.1 and 5.1 all about?
4.1 is a soap-box stand against the State graduation requirements.
Apparently the board is going to oppose the idea that our graduating High Schoolers must take a competency assessment.
It would probably prove that they (the board) weren't doing their job well.
5.1 is ALARMING. It implies that they intend to do canine searches of lockers, etc. This may well be a violation of student's civil liberties. At the very least I bet the ACLU and NAACP will be hot on this one!
While I agree that locker searches with canines is a violation, I believe the law upheld these as legal and valid. The lockers are not private property, the kids are minors, and it's in the interest of safety. At least I believe these were the reasons.
Only a schizophrenic board would object to graduation requirements and introduce locker searches in subsequent motions. And meanwhile
by introducing such topics, the elephant in the corner is being pointedly ignored.
Don't you get it? They are trying to "out" all the bad things about the high school. So they can say "we told you so". They are just looking for things now! It's a scavanger hunt at this point.
Another shrink will need to be added to the budget soon!
"Out" the bad things? Are these "bad things" sequestered in some closet? How about addressing the real issues, like the crumbling infrastraucture and the high taxes they promised to lower while maintaining a quality education?
Anonymous please explain the reason why “Another shrink will need to be added to the budget soon?”
Post a Comment