Countdown to April 29 to PERMANENTLY close M. R. Reiter. Ask the board to see the 6 point plan.
Showing posts with label Hellmann building report. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hellmann building report. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 15, 2008

BCCT and Emperor Spar

Today's BCCT carries a double shot of goodness today. First is the editorial that blasts the Stop the School "open and transparent" board members for their lack of openess and transparency.

The second is a guest opinion printing the statement that the Emperor read at a recent meeting.

We report, you decide.


Secret society: Unschooled board
Morrisville school board members are pursuing unpublicized agendas at private locations with little regard for the public’s right to know.

Officially, Bill Hellmann and the new majority on the Morrisville school board were given power by the people who voted them into office. Unfortunately, the people have been kept in the dark as the board routinely conducts business not only behind closed doors — but behind private closed doors.

As Courier Times columnist Kate Fratti reported, school board members are beating the state Sunshine Law’s quorum stipulation by meeting tag-team style at private locations. Sunday, it was at board member Brenda Worub’s home. Four of nine board members acknowledged being present at one time. A fifth attended earlier, but left before others arrived.

Questioned about the propriety of the secret meeting, Hellmann dismissed it as an issue: “I’m not sure there is anything to comment on. This is a gathering of friends, some of whom … happen to be on the school board. … We will continue to meet with each other, mindful of the law, whenever we wish.”

We’re not sure what Hellmann means by “mindful of the law,’’ but the tag-team meetings suggest a focus on the letter of the law rather than its spirit. In the process, the requirement that elected officials keep the public informed seems to have been forgotten, if not ignored.

Dedicated to undoing plans to build a new $30 million K-12 school, Hellmann and his supporters on the board have routinely worked behind the scenes since his anti-new school majority took over in January. But beyond stopping construction, the board apparently wants to scrap its high school program altogether — without any public input.

In her Monday column, Fratti reminded us of a string of backroom decisions, beginning with the board secretly contacting other districts about taking Morrisville High School kids on a tuition basis. Also secretly, engineers were asked to review conditions at all three borough schools. Now, the school district solicitor attorney who protested the secret hiring is expected to be replaced at the next board meeting. Hellmann originally directed that resumes for a new attorney be sent to his private office rather than the school district.

Bill Hellmann is a smart man. There’s no doubt about that. He’s a certified public accountant and in the Guest Opinion below, Hellmann confronts some of the criticism he’s faced. But there are matters he doesn’t address, including his recent demand — so far unfulfilled — that administrators reveal the names and addresses of special education students. Hellmann recently has preached the need to control the costs of special education.

The cost of special education is a common complaint among school officials. But Hellmann’s demand for the identities of students and their addresses is, well, frightening.

In our view, this unschooled board needs to learn some respect for the public’s right to know. Meanwhile, we encourage citizens — the parents of students, in particular — to stand up for their rights.


Cost of dissolving school bond debt pales next to savings

Regarding the recent Courier Times editorial, “Costly lessons,” as it pertains to the Morrisville School District. The article stated that the K-12 building project should have gone to a referendum. I agree with this statement and spoke several times at public meetings, imploring the prior board majority to do just that. They ignored me and many other people on this issue.

There was overwhelming opposition to this project and bond issue and it was emphatically proved at the polls in May 2007 and again in November 2007. I strongly disagree that our school buildings, at least the high school, are in awful condition. The high school needs some renovation and upgrades only. The school district is in the process of doing an evaluation of the school buildings.

I do not believe that we can build a quality K-12 school for $30 million. The Philadelphia Archdiocese plans to build two new high schools in our area, at a size not much larger than our planned school building but at a cost of $65 million each. I believe I was elected, in part, to help the school district provide a quality education for our children at a cost the community can afford.

The following is an explanation of dissolving the debt and how much was saved:

That the school district had to put up more than $24.4 million to dissolve $22 million proves how expensive the original bond issue was. But we also received an extra $1.67 million in bond premium with the original issue. There is no free lunch; this had to be paid back. This present board did not issue this expensive debt. The prior board majority issued this expensive debt. This bond issue has a 10-year call, which means we have to pay interest to the bondholders for 10 years whether we like it or not.

This is a long time and expensive. The prior majority board was told many times by this town not to issue this expensive debt. In fact, there was a citizen lawsuit to try to stop this expensive debt issue. We have no control over current interest rates. I, for one, am not going to play the interest rate game with public funds. If this was my money, maybe I would gamble, but not with public funds. We have to cut our losses and move forward.

Since the new school is not going to be built, IRS regulations require this debt to be dissolved within a certain time period — I believe three years from date of issue. We have to give it back. I believe this community elected the new board members to help the school district bring back fiscal and operational order. Eighty-five percent of the bond proceeds need to be spent within three years of issuance.

This partial dissolution freed up approximately $1.2 million in the current budget of the general fund. These funds can be used for more upgrades, a possible tax reduction for the ’08-’09 budget year or other items the board decides upon. We also plugged a probable $400,000 budget hole in the ’08-’09 budget. We also reduced the millage for the ’08-’09 budget year by approximately 7 mills. We also saved future tax millage by partially defeating this debt. We also probably saved (depending on current interest rates) approximately $460,000 (the difference between what we have to pay bondholders vs. what we would earn ($1.3 million vs. $855,000).

In summary, we saved $12.6 million in future interest costs by dissolving this $22 million in bonded debt. The bond premium money mentioned above in the amount of nearly $1.7 million, plus the nearly $1.2 million sitting in the general fond equals almost $2.9 million. This is more than the $2.4 million that was put up as extra money to dissolve the $22 million bond.

Disclosure of the bond dissolution was first made at a committee meeting back around Dec. 17. Another analysis was included in the board packet in January before the Jan. 30 vote. I am only one board member. We have nine members all together. If there were any questions on the dissolution, I would hope any board members would have asked our financial advisor or our bond attorney prior to or at the Jan. 30 public meeting.

Bill Hellmann
is president of the Morrisville school board and is a certified public accountant.

Monday, April 14, 2008

Keeping the public at bay in Morrisville

Kate Fratti has a column in the BCCT today looking at the SHHHHHH...*secret meeting* from last Sunday.

So here's another documented time when these yokels refuse to follow standard public meeting procedure and hide away from the public here in Morrisville.

They hid the Hellmann Report (although the Emperor did that more on his own, his accomplices backed him up. Accomplices are held equally accountable in the eyes of the law.); they hid the farming scheme; they hid any discussions or contacts with Delaware Valley High School. Now they're hiding their opposition to the special education kids. Maybe they want to farm them out too? Who knows? The Emperor never wants to tell us what silly stuff he's thinking about.

Our rights to free and open deliberations by our governmental representatives are being violated. Speak up and tell them you will not allow this to continue! *THEM* means all of this immoral majority. Despite the obvious imperial performance by William Hellmann, CPA, he cannot do this without accomplices: "Angry" Al Radosti, Marlys "Minutes take Months" Mihok, Brenda "Two for One" Worob, Bill "Honest Talker" Farrell, and Gloria "Do What Bill Says" Heater.

Look below and see about the emails going to Hellmann's private email address. This is another example of this board's skirting of laws and not leaving a public record. In the U.S. government, the checks and balances are there, and a House of Representatives Government Oversight committee is functioning. In this situation, YOU, the public, is the oversight.

If you don't speak up now, don't complain when they ignore you too.


Keeping the public at bay in Morrisville

I was muttering about open meeting laws again last week after getting off the phone with a caller who alleged Morrisville’s majority school board members were set to meet secretly on a recent Sunday.

He gave me the time, the address, and a tip about the agenda — a sexual harassment complaint by one worker against another.

Just what this little district needs: more controversy.

The board majority elected to block high school construction appears to want to do away with the high school program entirely. Without public deliberation, the majority contacted other schools about taking Morrisville kids on a tuition basis. Next, a Philadelphia outfit offered to privatize the high school. No public discussion about that either, so there’s no way to know where the offer stands.

Also without public debate, the board contracted with engineers for a cursory review of conditions in all three district schools. This, instead of the more thorough review and renovation action plan the board unanimously voted on in December.

We learn this month that the solicitor who protested the secret hiring and insisted on a public vote after the fact to “clean this up,” is expected to be replaced as early as the next school board meeting. Originally, school board President Bill Hellmann asked that all resumes for the job be sent to his private certified public accounting office instead of the school administration building.

And recently, the American Civil Liberties Union expressed interest in Morrisville schools. Why?

Here’s a clue.

Saying special ed costs must be controlled, Hellmann acknowledged he asked for the names and addresses of all special educations students, along with the services they receive and the individual cost for each child. Hellman said he’d settle for knowing whether each child lives in a house or an apartment if he can’t have names and addresses.

That kind of stuff will perk up the ACLU’s ears.

A week ago Sunday, I drove by the address my caller gave me — the home of school board member Brenda Worob and husband Stephen, a borough councilman.

The house was gaily decorated with patriotic buntings. An American flag was flapping at the front door. Surely the caller was mistaken.

But, I’ll be darned. I wrote down the makes of several cars to match them with board members later.

But I needn’t have been so Brenda Starr.

Hellmann conceded to Sunday’s gathering as soon as I asked him about it. No sleuthing needed.

“I’m not sure what there is to comment on,” he said, since there was never a quorum Sunday.

“This was a gathering of friends, some of whom — never more than four school board members — happen to be on the school board. … We will continue to meet with each other, mindful of the law, whenever we wish.”

Although five school board members were at the Worob home Sunday afternoon — Worob, Hellmann, Marlys Mihok, Bill Farrell and Al Radosti (who left before some others arrived) — we are asked to believe no specific school business was discussed.

That harassment complaint? There was one. It was brought to the full board’s attention at a legal executive session after the agenda meeting.

“The way I see it, we have to do just three things,” Hellmann told me after that executive session. “We have to provide students with an education, to do it in a way that is affordable, and to follow the law.”

Patriotic buntings aside, I think he refers to the letter of the law, not necessarily the spirit.

Kate Fratti, whose column appears on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, suspects that once this board concedes to deliberate all matters in public, they’ll do it in pig Latin.
Editor: Carl LaVO, 215-949-4227 clavo@phillyBurbs.com

Saturday, April 5, 2008

RFPs Are Meant to be Ignored

So here we go again, spending "emergency" repair money cluelessly. tossing it after issues without an overall plan. The Emperor's snarling "But what if there's a fire" comments have spurred immediate action on advertising for a RFP. Contrast that, of course, to the RFP that was commissioned in December. Emperor Billy-Boy meant to read it and approve it for publication quickly, but well, it wasn't a priority, so it got ignored.

But, BY GOD! What if there's a fire! responses mean the RFP gets done pretty quickly.



NOTICE TO BIDDERS
The Board of School Directors are requesting bids for the individual items listed below. Specifications may be obtained from the Business Office, School District of Borough of Morrisville, 550 West Palmer St., Morrisville, PA 19067 (215-736-5933). The individual items and bid opening times are as follows: Electrical Repair Work
8:30 a.m. April 21, 2008
Fire Alarm/
Fire Suppression Repairs
9:30 a.m. April 21, 2008
Plumbing Code Repairs
10:30 a.m. April 21, 2008
Sealed Bids must be received before the above listed deadlines at which time they will be opened publicly in Conference Room F-10 of the Mid/Sr. High School. The owner reserves the right to waive any information and to accept or reject any/all bids in its best interest.
Marlys Mihok
Secretary

Appeared in: Bucks County Courier Times on Friday, 04/04/2008


It's a dance that everyone gets to participate in, but I ask why anyone would really bid on these jobs? Yes, I know, it's like the lottery (you cant win it unless you're in it) but why would I, as a somewhat respected and competent craftsman, bid on something with these yokels? The board freely and cluelessly meanders through the process, ignoring those who have actually done the hard work of planning a construction project AND shepherding it through the PlanCon process. Here they reject reality and replace it with their own rather unusual reality. Paging Adam Savage: The Emperor is calling.

But therein lies the answer: They will have many, many bids. Because as anyone knows, when a client has money to throw away and can afford to do the same job two or three times, it's always better to be there to be awarded the same work repeatedly. Without an overarching plan here to control spending, that is exactly what will happen.

Make sure you take note of the disjointed thinking patterns. The Emperor is aghast at the costs for special education students and wants to nickel and dime those costs. But when it comes to supporting the construction industry, it's belly up to the bar time!

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Yeah, But Could Rich Little Do It Better?

Here's an interesting item. An impression of the Emperor, as performed by an aspiring impersonator. It's as haughty, disdainful, and dismissive a performance as the original. So?

Speaking of the original, come on out tonight to Wednesday Night Live, starring Bill Hellmann and eight other rather insignificant and minor cast members. The warm ups start at 6:30 with the Education Committee and at 7:00 with the Human Resources Committee. Both of those meetings are in the G-Hall conference room.

This is followed by the full show at 7:30 in the LGI. Bill's topics tonight include waffling on the $2.4 million dollars he spent to save the district, and seeking to remove the superintendent, Dr. Yonson, and the facilities director, Tim Lastichen. It looks like Mr. Lastichen is going to be the ceremonial scapegoat to take on all of the sins of the past boards for failing to fund proper maintenance.

We're also going to go ahead and use the $2500 Hellmann Buildings Report to fund repairs. This might be a problem as Robin Reithmeyer has already shown that once this item was defeated at the February meeting, it needs to be off the schedule for three months before it can be reintroduced. (Memo to Emperor: You really needed to have an item in the agenda rescinding the rule before introducing the repairs item.)

Finally, we're going to approve some of the minutes outstanding since Marlys Mihok assumed the secretarial office. It doesn't seem like this is all of them though.

Come on out and join the fun. Come out and SUPPORT YOUR KIDS!

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Now What?

You talkin' to me?

Yeah. I'm talkin' to you.

If you're angry, irritated, infuriated, exasperated, aggravated, upset, wound up, bothered, maddened, frustrated, displeased, provoked, riled, incensed, cheesed off, put out, hacked off, narked, ticked off, dissatisfied, discontented, disaffected, displeased; fretful, complaining, querulous, pettish, testy, petulant, cranky; chafed, annoyed, piqued, vexed, aggravated, amplified, angry, anxious, augmented, beset, bothered, browned-off, bugged, burnt-up, chafed, deliberately provoked, distressed, disturbed, embarrassed, embittered, enhanced, enlarged, exacerbated, exasperated, galled, griped, harassed, heated up, heightened, hotted up, huffy, inconvenienced, increased, intensified, irked, irritated, magnified, miffed, nettled, peeved, perturbed, piqued, plagued, provoked, put-out, put to it, puzzled, resentful, riled, roiled, ruffled, sore beset, soured, troubled, vexed, worried, worse, worsened, or something else in that general mood, then you're exactly the one I want to talk to.

The problem is that I need you to take action. Are you ready? Thanks to jon for providing this comprehensive list of the Hellmann Administration's successes so far:

1. Hire a note-taker for Marlys;
2. Pay back this year's portion of the $2.4 million bond defeasement costs;
3. Pay this year's costs to switch banks to satisfy Bill Hellmann's vendetta against the original bond broker, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
4. Pay for the $2,500 flimsy unauthorized study Hellmann unilaterally commissioned on the Middle-High School;
5. Pay for $8,000 in similar flimsy studies Hellmann wants to do on the elementary schools, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
6. Pay for the ~$200,000 in repairs to the Middle-High School mentioned in the flimsy unauthorized $2,500 study above that Hellmann claimed were safety-related but Dr. Yonson, Reba Dunford, the District's maintenance guy, and about 15 other engineering firms indicated are not - again, if he succeeds at next month's meeting in passing the vote, provided his buddies Marlys, Al, & Gloria are there this time to bail him out);
7. Pay again to fix the doors at MR Reiter that were not fixed properly on the cheap in another unilateral move by Hellmann and will now have to be re-done, at a greater cost than the original estimate.

I know there's more. But isn't this enough?

The parents WILL be shut out of the decision process unless you take action now.

Tell the board you are disgusted with their antics so far. You can do it by email or by telling them face to face at one of the opportunities listed below:

**Parent Advisory, Tuesday March 11, 6:00 P.M. in the MHS LGI
**Infrastructure and Finance Committee Meetings, Wednesday March 12 at 6:30 and 7:00 P.M. MHS G-Hall conference room.
**Board of Ed Agenda Meeting, Wednesday March 12, 7:30 P.M. MHS LGI
**Education and Human Resources Committee Meetings, Wednesday March 26 at 6:30 and 7:00 P.M. MHS G-Hall conference room.
**Board of Ed Business Meeting, Wednesday March 26, 7:30 P.M. in the MHS LGI

Your silence or inaction gives them the courage to continue their disregard for the parents as an integral part of the education process. Don't let that happen.

Monday, March 10, 2008

Push Polling


Thank you to everyone who has contributed their experiences with the biased push poll that they received from the "school district." As previously noted, the district did not authorize this poll.

So before we take a look at this poll, let's review some of the bias that the phrasing of the questions and the recording of the answers can cause. A great sample of this bias comes from the Non Sequitir comic from Sunday.

A quote that has been attributed to Soviet dictator Josef Stalin goes like this: Those who cast the Votes, they decide nothing. Those who count the votes, they decide everything. A variant translation is: The people who cast the votes decide nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything. **Please note: Hold the hate mail. Despite the dictatorial similarities between the Emperor and Stalin, I am not comparing them. Stalin is still far more autocratic than a local school board president.**

So in this case, we answer a biased poll and the desired answers are pulled from the loaded questions already asked. Check out this short video on how to make a biased poll.

For those of you who were not blessed by the postal fairy with a survey, TA-DA! Here it is.

The sound you just heard was a million English teachers crying out in unison in great pain and torment.

Among the misspellings and grammatical errors are "INFARSTRUCTURE" in the title (should be "INFRASTRUCTURE") and return no later "that" 3/17/2008 rather than "than." Question 4 references "formally" rather than "formerly", and also does not capitalize "high school" as in "Morrisville high school."

That's the easy stuff that probably lowers this by at least one grade level. Now for the advanced errors in presentation.

Question 1 sets up the idea that *gasp* we might need a single school to service the approximately 1000 students.

Question 2 addresses the urgent need for plumbing, HVAC, electric and window infrastructure upgrades, as well as an opportunity to determine which one is more important, of if we should do them all together. This sounds like one of those triage scenes from M*A*S*H where Hawkeye and BJ decide who gets to be operated on first and then get into a fight over the diagnosis. The patient is terminal. Almost no amount of renovation will be a cost-effective life saver.

Question 3 goes to the heart of the screaming from the people so concerned that their little 4 year old pre-schoolers would be subjected to 18 year old seniors in the same school building. Do we need one, two, or three buildings in town. For everyone who missed it, the defeated new high school was specifically designed to keep the grades separated in different wings. Now we'll reverse engineer the process on the fly.

Question 4 is the payoff question that you were led to from the first three questions. You already agreed to renovate the high school for 1000 students. You agreed that one or more of the critical systems are failing, and you agreed to fix at least one building. So you are committed to answering yes. You are further committed to closing the two elementary schools OR closing 75% of MHS. How? To "continue as usual" is a ridiculous answer because you already said that we cannot continue along the same path.

You also unknowingly agreed to the fallacious argument that a reduction of 75% in the number of students means that 75% of the school is unused. With this same logic, since we had nine school board members for 4000 students, we should now reduce the board down by 75% and eliminate 6.75 members. Ouch! Sounds like it might be painful to be the designated 1/4 member.

What about the heating costs? We're using oil heat in inefficient boilers with antiquated single pane window glass. Both are well past their useful life and need to be replaced. Just doing the boilers and windows would reduce the heating costs. I'd even like to see floor plans of just what 75% you want to shut off. With the hallway configurations available, show us what is superfluous.

Question 5. My, oh my. There was an audit done in 2008? Perhaps you are referring to the I'll take "Cover The Emperor's Butt" for $2500, Alex hastily prepared defeasement report? If that is an audit, then I want these people working at the IRS for my next audit. You have an RFP out for a real audit that includes poking and prodding into critical systems.

In fairness, we pretty much already know what the audit will find. That we were getting off easily with a $32 million dollar new school. We'll probably find that even with cost overruns, we were getting off easily with a $37 million dollar new school.

There's another issue here as well. Have you ever heard about the the five phases of any project: “Enthusiasm, trouble, search for a scapegoat, punishment of the innocent, and praise and reward for all non-participants”? It looks like the board is setting up one or more scapegoats to accept punishment for the condition of the schools. Maybe they should keep in mind that the political side (the board itself) sets priorities and spending limits and the operational side (the people who actually do the work) work within those limits.

So you want to hire a "skilled facilities director"? With what money? What rich uncle died and left money to the district? Maybe we can ask the secretary to give back her (so far) under-earned stipend to help defray part of the cost. I see a lot of spending going on ($2500 for the Hellman building report, $2.4 million to return the bond money, for example) but I am unclear on the savings that have been achieved so far.

Final thoughts: Where are replies sent? Where is anything identifying this as a product of the MSD? Well, maybe that was a saving grace, because this is an embarrassing contribution to this contentious battle. Is there no one else out there who can obtain the information in a reasonably fair and unbiased way without embarrassing us all?

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Just Another Night in Morrisville, Part III

I may need some assistance on some of the details of this part of the story, because the reconstruction I have seems to have some portions at odds with each other. SO...while some of the details of this may have to be clarified, the result is spot on.

If you remember back to the time following the revelation that the Emperor self-commissioned the $2500 Hellman building report to cover his tracks for the defeasement, it was suggested and broadly hinted at, that the Emperor was given a talking to by Counsel Kelly and the rest of the board. (Disclaimer: I was not there and those that were there are not talking. At least not to me. But if you want to, my email is listed at the top.) He was basically told, you're new and inexperienced, and you're eager to push your agenda, but this is not allowed. You can't run your own show here. You act in the name of the board only. We're covering you this time by an 8-1 vote. Go and sin no more.

Now, last night, we find out that the Emperor has been lunching with the district health care provider contact and/or other health care provider contacts (please, someone clarify!) in order to promote "competition" among the providers.

The problem is that the board did not sanction this. The Emperor also apparently casually mentioned that he was "the boss" and he wanted action taken to reduce costs to the district. (Clarification requested.)

Let me stop here and applaud the idea that the Emperor was promoting, not the way it was done. Stimulating competition and lowering costs is worthy. The Emperor has a problem with the "red tape" stuff and clearly and loudly proclaimed this for all to hear.

Captain Obvious reports that many people who have a high disdain for authority and controls have an authority and control problem of their own. Not that I'm making a correlation here, you understand.

So, that's when Robin Reithmeyer unleashed her latest load of lèse majesté and told the Emperor that this board runs on red tape.

Momentary reality check: A self professed experienced CPA with extensive contact with the US Tax Code and the IRS, as well as several municipal governments in Pennsylvania, is unaware that red tape runs the world. Um...I'm thinking, maybe...NOT!


But then, the other four board members, even Mrs. Steve "You Squandered Two Million Dollars Of Our Money" Worob began chiding him. So did Counsel Kelley. So did the audience. They had all already privately told him once not to overreach and to operate beyond his mandate. Now, the public got to watch and join in.

With last night's performance, quite a bit was lost. The openness and honesty that the Stop the Schoolers supposedly ran on, and that Bill Farrell (honestly and sincerely, I believe) mentions quite often, is revealed as nothing but hollow words, as empty as the chocolate bunnies on Easter morning when you bite their ears off. With these acts, one man has made a mockery of the eight remaining members of the board, the school administration that he holds in high disregard, the parents that he openly ignores, and yes, even the taxpayers that he is allegedly crusading for.

Don't believe me? See for yourself on the replays all next week. Watch and check back in with us here and let us know what you think. Unless the tape is mysteriously damaged or lost.

When the name "Bill Clinton" is mentioned, I'm sure the first association you made to a word was "liar". I'm not sure what one word will stick here, but for William I, Emperor of Education, I have no doubt that the single word will show itself sooner rather than later.

I believe my three minutes are up. Feel free to add as you will.

Just Another Night in Morrisville, Part II

When we last left our story, an open insurrection was beginning against the autocratic rule of the Emperor. The members of the Q in the audience were aghast at her insolence. The Emperor himself was rocked and resorted to babbling semi-coherently about school safety issues.

But before we visit this storyline, let's take a look at the delivery of the Q-gram last weekend that was discussed by several speakers. For some bizarre reason, it was disclosed that pictures are taken of the houses that receive a Q-gram. Do me a favor and leave me off the distribution list.

The shocking revelation that the class of 2008 did poorly on the mathematics section of the PSSA was not shocking. The only people that were shocked were the dilettantes who bungee in to piously shed mock public tears about our education woes and then obliviously bungee out again until the next pseudo-crisis arises.

I am as disappointed in the math score as anyone is, but the truth of the matter is that real watchers and supporters of the Morrisville school district knew this already, because they were briefed by Dr. Beth Yonson.

The percentile scores for the class of 2008 were 28% scoring proficient or higher in mathematics. In reading, it was 58%. In writing, it was 86%. We have work to do in math, but it looks like the reading and writing scores are pretty good.

There was also a speaker who did an analysis of the complete scores for the entire state. Again, while the math scores were disappointing, they were not wildly out of synch with the rest of the state.

Kudos to Robin Reithmeyer, who had the audacity to openly proclaim that the Emperor had no clothing. She laid out her case rather well (does anyone have a copy of her statement?) and had several pointed exchanges with His Highness.

Then came the insurrection. Robin pointed put that the Emperor was trying to spend money without a comprehensive plan, and that if he has allowed the original December RFP for bids to have gone out without meddling with it, the board would be reviewing the bids already, not just the process. She also properly noted that the items listed as code violations are longstanding items that are grandfathered in. She further noted that the bids will be opened next week and spending the money now without a plan was foolish.

My understanding is that the Emperor melted down quite like the Wicked Witch of the West when Dorothy doused her. He babbled about fires in the school and how the children were in danger.

Isn't it curious how these same items existed last year and candidate Hellmann didn't want them addressed, and now that he's holding on to personal responsibility for it, he's the Mother Theresa of repairs?

The $200,000 in repairs only covered the high school, not the two elementary schools. These schools are even worse off than the high school.

Speaking of the elementary schools, The Emperor arranged for his buddies to do another study, this time at the elementary schools. This time, he even managed to mention it to the board before the study started.

Both of these items failed to be approved, by a 3-3 tie, with Hellmann, Worob and Farrell wanting to plunge along without a plan, and Reithmeyer, Kemp, and Frankenfield wanting a comprehensive plan. **NOTE ADDED: I should mention that Bill Farrell has a deep and genuine interest in the safety of the schools and the students, and I believe that he is more interested in safe schools "right now" so that our kids are safe.**

On another note, I don't understand all of this, so if someone has the info, please share, but apparently Hellmann has a serious personal issue with the banking institution holding the district's money. A move out of here was not approved as well.

Then came the revelation that Billy-Boy stuck his hand in the cookie jar. Again.

More to come.

Just Another Night in Morrisville, Part I

A line like that conjures up a quiet, placid, gentle evening. Bird call, dog bark, cat meow, and cricket chirp, all combining to create their symphony of the night. Well, just like Dr. Johnny Fever transitioning the formerly quiet music station into WKRP by dragging the needle across the LP (kids, ask your fossilized parents to explain what I just said), let's take a look at last night's school board business meeting where the fun and laughs were non-stop.

Thank you to everyone who dropped me a line with their take on last night's meeting. There was a general agreement on one thing: What is the Emperor thinking?

First, let's start off with the rumor that the defeasement cost $2 million dollars. I can categorically report that information is 100% completely false. It was actually about $2.4 million. No one knew about it except the Emperor until it was all over. The public and even a few of the board members pleaded for judicious deliberations at the January 23 meeting, but the defeasement express plowed onward. We now know the true cost. Between the previous feasibility studies and the current debt retirement costs, Morrisville is now the proud possessor of a $5 million dollar sports complex in the rear of the high school. The only good thing this did was provide a closure for the "squandering" squawkers to cease their pseudo-frugal spending chant. No matter what the Gibson board spent as an entity on studies and analyses, the Hellmann board, single handedly, spent more.

A second, and slightly more bizarre note to the defeasement, is that the Emperor will not "dumb down" a defeasement cost presentation for the board or the public. It's too complicated for us mere non-CPA mortals to comprehend. However, he will invite us to feast at the right hand of power and trek to his office where he will personally lead us through the magical mystery money tour and show us his spreadsheet. There's something about that that sounds vaguely unsettling in a sidewalk flasher type of way...

The new board secretary, Marlys Mihok, was not in attendance last night. Also missing in action are the minutes from the January 2 special meeting; the January 9 agenda meeting; the January 30 special meeting; and the February 13 agenda meeting. So now the Morrisville School District will pay for someone else to do her job. This is in addition to the stipend that she receives for not doing it and is keeping, despite past board practice of donating it back to the financially strapped community. It figures. One of the few times that I want the Emperor to exercise his financial fix-it magic pixie dust, he's asleep on the job, voting to allow Marlys to continue piling up missing minutes faster than a state work crew on a coffee break.

Then, it got interesting. With reliable toadies Mihok, Angry Al and Gloria Heater not in attendance, the first cracks in the Emperor's invincibility aura appeared.

The Emperor was ready to deny tenure to a dedicated and caring teacher if it involved a raise for her. Even if it did (and it does not, until next school year), that's a very petty attitude, but perfectly consistent for the Emperor. Congrats to our MHS vocals teacher who gained tenure last evening.

The Hellmann Building Report, formerly known as the defeasement fig leaf, was used as the rock solid cornerstone for an emergency safety repairs resolution to spend an open ended amount of money (only some $200,000 was identified, the rest was "to be determined"). At first the Emperor wanted to table the motion because his vote counting skills showed three storm troopers missing from the front lines. When the board refused to table, the Emperor became passionate about spending the money because the "professional engineers" identified these issues. Very passionate. Extremely passionate. So passionate that one has to wonder what might be in it for him.

This is not a swipe at the engineering firm. They are a well respected company with a long track record of success. But we have noted the lapses in the report, including that it is, by the candid admission of the firm, incomplete. What did you expect for $2500? A full report complete with Power Point slides?

So then, a voice of reason started to speak. It was persistent, clear, and unambiguous. Robin Reithmeyer wanted to know enough information so that she could make up her own mind, rather than relying on royal pronouncements of whim to guide her vote. She even mentioned an email that the Emperor had sent to her instructing her to keep quiet and just cooperate.

The plot thickens. More later.

Saturday, February 16, 2008

Another Feasibility Study...

I just wonder what the Q will say about this. Isn't it just squandering the district's money to do ANOTHER study?

NOTICE
The School District of Borough of Morrisville will accept sealed bids on a proposal for a school facility study of all currently used buildings and grounds of the District. Bids will be received until 10:00 a.m. prevailing time, March 7, 2008 at which time they will be opened and read publicly in Conference Room F-10 of the Middle/ Senior High School, 550 West Palmer Street, Morrisville, PA.
A walk through of the facilities is required. Interested parties may obtain a copy of the Request for Proposal and to schedule a walk through by contacting Reba Dunford, CPA, Business Administrator, School District of Borough of Morrisville, 550 West Palmer Street, Morrisville, PA 19067.
Marlys Mihok, Secretary

Appeared in: Bucks County Courier Times on Saturday, 02/16/2008

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Coronation Day

The Emperor was formally crowned by the BCCT today in an editorial.

Morrisville's monarchy

William Hellman was elected school board president in Morrisville, not king. We mention this because of Hellman's penchant for one-man rule.

For example, at last week's school board meeting Hellman asked the board to approve and pay for an engineering study of Morrisville High School. Not that board members had much choice. The study was completed — at Hellman's direction and without board input, meaning without board approval.

All that was left for the board to consider was the bill.

Now, $2,500 isn't a big deal, not for school boards that routinely deal in millions of dollars. The big deal is a freelancing school board president who doesn't seem to understand his role or the law — and doesn't seem to care.

Said Hellman when asked why he didn't include the board in the engineering study decision: “That's minor. I'm not going to comment on that.”

That's arrogant and unacceptable.

Making decisions behind the board's and public's back isn't minor. It's major.

It's a violation of the public trust, probably school board policy and possibly the law. And citizens shouldn't stand for it.

We'd like to think that the school board won't stand for it either, but most members are in Hellman's corner on the big issue facing the board — undoing the $30 million plan to build a new K-12 school.

With the undoing largely done, the board now has to figure out what it will cost to renovate the high school or if the district even plans to retain a high school. As these issues move forward, we implore board members to work openly — and together.

Saturday, February 2, 2008

More BCCT Coverage of Hellmann Report

Sorry everyone, but I slept in this morning. Believe it or not, the kids AND spouse AND all the pets remained asleep in their beds, with nary a vision of sugarplums dancing in our heads. Thanks to jon for the heads up.

Manasee Wagh was at the Wednesday Night Follies and files her report.

Asked why he kept everyone in the dark, the Emperor is quoted as saying “That's minor. I'm not going to comment on that.”

MINOR?? I'm going to look up some of the similar statements that President Nixon said in the summer of 1972 when that minor third rate burglary was discovered. Remember, Nixon didn't lose his office because of Watergate (the burglary), but Watergate (the coverup.) Stop the coverup, all nine, excuse me, eight, of you. Thanks to Joe Kemp for his vote on this matter: A PRINCIPLED NO.

The supreme arrogance of this autocrat amazes me.

Even the Wick Fisher White people are abandoning Hellmann: There are a lot of variables involved in renovation, and without doing further study it's not really practical to provide a figure for total expenses, said an engineer from Wick Fisher White. He did not want to be named. LOL!! I wouldn't either.

I'll copy the text of the article below. But before I do, I mentioned yesterday how in Kate Fratti's column, the Emperor's toadies were dismissing his minor laspe as nothing more than a mistake made by a good man overwhelmed with the nuances of government work. I noted in response that he was the elected Morrisville Borough Controller, and surely he had gained some government experience in that position. I found the League of Womens Voters Guide to the 2007 election online, and the SELF PROVIDED entry for the Emperor is:

"practicing CPA who has provided accounting and consulting to many Pennsylvania Municipal Governments for the past 29 years. I also bring business skills and business savvy."

I'll admit that school administration is different from municipal administration. Having said that, after 30 years in the government arena, he know that rules exist, and they need to be followed. That's what the professionals (Yonson and Dunford) are there for.

Business savvy? I'm thinking like, maybe, NOT!

BTW, does anyone want to change the graphics here into "Stop the Secrecy"?

Board OKs engineering study after being kept in the dark
By MANASEE WAGH

Bucks County Courier Times

In a surprise move at this week's meeting of the Morrisville school board, President William Hellmann asked the board to approve and pay for a recent engineering evaluation on the middle/high school.

Hellmann had hired the firm independently and without approval by the board.


Prior to its vote to return most of a $30 million bond that would have paid for a new K-12 school, board members approved the firm's evaluation report. The report included recommendations for building improvements and a breakdown of how much those improvements would cost. Part of the vote included paying the firm's $2,500 fee.


About 50 residents were at Wednesday's meeting, and roughly 12 spoke during the public comment session. Several implored the board to hold off on returning any bond money until a thorough analysis of Morrisville's three schools is made and an estimate on how much fixing problems would cost.


The main concern was that repairs would be too expensive not to borrow more money.


Another loan would likely raise taxes, according to administrators.


“Hold off and table this issue, until we have a more long-term plan and know how much money we have,” resident and former board member Peter Eisengrein told the board. “If you have a plan and numbers, please share them.”


Several board members disapproved of being kept in the dark about the engineering study until it was done, as well as the sudden need to pay $2,500. However, after much discussion, all but Joseph Kemp finally voted to accept the report and absorb the fee.


Asked why he didn't include the board in the hiring of the firm, Hellmann said Thursday, “That's minor. I'm not going to comment on that.”


The original $30 million loan would have funded a new school building for the district's 1,000-plus students. According to members of the previous board, a new school would have been a cheaper alternative in the long run to renovating the middle/high school and two elementary schools.


Reba Dunford, the district's business administrator, urged the board to keep the remaining $28.5 million of the bond until renovation costs are determined. The previous board used about $1.5 million of the $30 million bond for engineer and architect fees related to the proposed new school.


Dunford presented an example of a detailed Pennsbury School District high school renovation plan. The building is similar in size to Morrisville's middle/high school.


The cost estimate for Pennsbury was about $20.5 million in 2005. Because of rising costs, fixing such a building would now be more expensive, Dunford said.


Some members of the community congratulated Hellmann on pushing the annulment of $22 million of the bond.


The previous board squandered a portion of the original $30 million bond, said Morrisville resident Stephen Worob, a borough council member, referring to the fees paid out. The proposed new school would have created a tax increase of more than $646 annually, Dunford said last May.


Now that there is not going to be a new school, an evaluation was needed to define future renovation work and authorize related expenditures, said Ernest R. Closser III, the attorney hired by Hellmann as bond counsel. The engineering firm's walk-through provided the preliminary analysis and projected expenses related to renovations, he added.


“You can't pursue projects without preliminary cost estimates, according to the state debt act,” Closser said.


District solicitor Thomas Kelly pointed out that hiring a firm means spending public money. The proper course of action would have been for the board to present bids for firms publicly, and only then vote on a firm, he said.


Hellmann independently invited Philadelphia-based Wick Fisher White Engineers to evaluate the “major infrastructure components of the existing high school,” according to the firm's report. The evaluation was distributed to board members on the day of the meeting Wednesday.


On Jan. 17, engineers looked at the boilers, plumbing, electrical systems and windows to determine if they should be repaired or left as is, according to the report.


The report also noted that observations were limited to portions of the building that were viewed during a walk-through. No further investigation, such as performing calculations to verify the capacity of existing equipment, was done.


Engineers recommended 10 immediate actions be taken, such as installing automatic fire suppression systems in kitchen exhaust hoods for about $15,000 per system. Ten other actions were recommended to be taken in the next three to five years. The report further described additional observations and recommendations.


Total repair cost is not listed in the report.


There are a lot of variables involved in renovation, and without doing further study it's not really practical to provide a figure for total expenses, said an engineer from Wick Fisher White. He did not want to be named.


Copies of the full report are available in the business administrator's office and on the district Web site, at www.mv.org. It's called “Existing Systems Report by Wick, Fisher and White.”


Superintendent Elizabeth Yonson said the district has heard no talk yet about a feasibility study for the two elementary schools. Both need renovations.


“We're very confused by that ourselves and there's a lot of work to be done on that as well,” she said. “The facilities committee really needs to address this issue.”



Friday, February 1, 2008

Kate Fratti Nails It!

Kate Fratti talks about Wednesday evening's school board meeting in her column today. She also had a late blog entry last night on Superintendent Yonson and Business Administrator Dunford, two outstanding women who have been harried, harassed, bullied, and excluded by "The People's Board". She also mentions Delaware Valley High School in Philly, a possible pasture for the farmed MHS students. Check out the Google map! Four locations nearby to serve you! Only a short bus ride down Route 1/Roosevelt Boulevard in rush hour traffic.

Kate: Thank you! For way too long, too many small minded hypocritical people have been at work in much of Morrisville, and it's nice to see the rock lifted off of some of them to see exactly how they work.

The "People's Board" is nothing of the kind. The people are left out in secrecy and back room deals for board member buddies, cronies, and contacts.

It may not be Tom Cruise who is the school board's "Top Gun", but Emperor William "Maverick" Hellmann CPA is. He loves rules...sit down, shut up...but when the rules apply to him? "Rules? We don't need no stinkin' rules!" I wonder if he says that to the IRS when one of his clients is audited?

You all know that if the board had voted to table the $2500 payment, then defeasement would have failed, right? That's why the Emperor was emphatic in his continued less than sotto-voce "NO" as the tabling question continued to be called. Without a payment, there was no report. Without a report, there was no defeasement.

Have you read the Hellmann Report? It tells us NOTHING that we did not already know. The "inspection" was also a sham. It was not an "inspection" (think white-gloved Marine master sergeant) but a "tour" (think a stroll through the park). The list of what they didn't do is impressive.



I would hope that even some of the Q are embarrassed by the Emperor's activities to date.

Kate Fratti also makes one more mention in her column. It's about halfway through where the Hellmann supporters say he's a decent man so immersed in the business world that he doesn't understand democratic government. Let me get this straight...Hellmann, who was the elected Morrisville borough controller, doesn't understand government? Maybe someone should be independently auditing the books on Union Street as well as on Palmer Avenue.

Thursday, January 31, 2008

Guest Blogger

I received the following letter this morning and was given permission to post it, but without attribution. It's a rather detailed letter and what I was able to check out does come back as accurate, so let's take a look and see what you think.

The actual motion that they read last night when voting on the defeasement of the bond stated that they have a professional estimate and a clear understanding of what needs to be done with the facilities and that they are therefore making an informed decision in how much money they are defeasing. The law won't allow them to defease blindly (which is what they are doing). This language was actually in their motion. Voting yes was, in my opinion, fraudulent. This has not been done, and the administrators are even saying so (see yesterday's paper).

Paragraph 3 of their motion tonight read:

“the school district has received realistic cost estimates from qualified engineers, architects or other persons qualified by experience as to the amounts necessary to satisfy the costs to be incurred with respect to the revised capital project, the total estimated cost of which is in excess of the amount of the remaining proceeds of the bonds”

As anyone with a brain can see, they have not done this. There is not even a 'revised project' to speak of. They have no idea what they are doing. They are still 'exploring all options'. Without question, since they went ahead defeased the bonds last night we can proceed with the following:

I have a copy of the school code. Below is section 318. It applies if a board member refuses or neglects to perform any duty imposed upon it by the provisions of this act relating to school districts (the act being the PA School Code).
"Any 10 resident taxpayers in the district may present a petition in writing, verified by oath or affirmation of at least 3 such resident taxpayers, to the court of common pleas of the county in which such district, setting forth the facts of such refusal or neglect of duty on the part of such school directors.............(too much to type).......the court shall have the power to remove the board, or such of its number as in its opinion is proper, and appoint for the unexpired terms other qualified persons in their stead."

Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus.

Their actions last night, in my opinion, constitute gross malfeasance of duty. We have documentation out the kazoo of the facility problems (I know of a previous Board member who has kept EVERYTHING documenting our facilities problems), with engineers and architects that would gladly testify to such in court. They have no idea how many schools they will have to maintain/renovate and they have a limited idea as to what one option may cost. They won't tell us what that option is, in fact, their president did this without Board approval, another action that can and should be challenged in court. Their administration has already told them they are being irresponsible. There is also something called gross malfeasance of duty for which a Board member can actually be sued personally as well, so if it costs the district money to borrow the additional money they will certainly be needed, it may only have to come from the people who voted yes last night, not the entire town.

There are many other Acts that Board members are required to comply with, such as 22 Pa Code (link is below), which indicates items such as :
(10) Professional educators shall exert reasonable effort to protect the student from conditions which interfere with learning or are harmful to the student’s health and safety.
More importantly, there are requirements in the school code for Boards to fully inform the public of their proposed facility plans before moving forward with any financial steps in regards to them. They absolutely have NOT done this. Some Board members don't even know what their 'tentative' plans are at this point, and the public has in no way had the oportunity to speak their opinions about it. This Board doesn't stand a chance in court, which is probably why the solicitor was sweating bullets and stammering for words in regards to their actions.

In regards Board members obligations to provide good facilities, please read the below school code information (I.e. they are bound to comply with this by law).
§7-701. Duty to provide; conditions.

The board of school directors of each district shall provide the necessary grounds and suitable school buildings to accommodate all the children between the ages of six and twenty-one years, in said district, who attend school. Such buildings shall be constructed, furnished, equipped, and maintained in a proper manner as herein provided. Suitable provisions shall be made for the heating (including the purchase of fuel), ventilating, adequate lighting, and sanitary conditions thereof, and for a safe supply of water, so that every pupil in any such building may have proper and healthful accommodations.

I can't find the complete school code on-line, but this site

http://members.aol.com/StatutesP5/24A.html

Has much of it if you wish to browse. I'm sure previous Board members may have copies available to those who wish to see it, also you can go to the school district and see it there as well.

Additionally, I would like to ask any parent who has a child in our district, whose child is harmed in any way as a result of our poor district facilities, or has contracted an illness that they believe is a result of our facilities to come forward. There is substantial documentation in regards to the poor conditions of our facilities (has anyone tried to breath in MR Reiter lately), that parents have many courses of action that they can take against this Board (both professionally as Board members and personally) who is blatantly ignoring the welfare of their children. Again, previous Board members have documentation to help any such parents with their various courses of action to protect their children.

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Open Mike Night at the Defeasement

According to peter's comments, the bond is defeased by a vote of 6-3. Please let us all in on what happened tonight.

Also, a look into how Emperor William Hellmann CPA and financial planner works with Reba Dunford.



ADDED: The BCCT had a short to-the-point factual article on the meeting.

ADDED: The Hellmann Report is now available at the MSD website